Return-Path: X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3954F3A0BF5 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 18:31:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.224 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.224 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.276, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S7OXVFWQMoPm for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 18:31:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6EE73A0BF4 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 18:31:17 -0800 (PST) X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.177.57.99; From: "Susan Hares" To: "'idr@ietf. org'" Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 21:31:08 -0500 Message-ID: <00ca01d5f1cc$f73166d0$e5943470$@ndzh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00CB_01D5F1A3.0E5B5ED0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdXxy/ffQMsdWV5mTo6wFPQedkx8+w== Content-Language: en-us X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200303-0, 03/03/2020), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com Archived-At: Subject: [Idr] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-00.txt (original: 11/20 to 12/3/2019) Extension from 3/3 to 3/10 X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 02:31:19 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00CB_01D5F1A3.0E5B5ED0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetings: This is a 1 week extension on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-00.txt. This draft attempts to speed up the allocation for BGP-LS parameters in IANA's "Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Parameters Registry". This document updates RFC 7752 by changing the allocation policy for all of the registries to "Expert Review" and by updating the guidance to the Designated Experts. John and I really want to speed up any of the registries assignments of BGP-LS we can. We think the mechanism that Adrian Farrel proposes provides a good idea. We hope you will read this draft and consider if you agree with us. During the 11/20 to 12/3/2019 WG LC, we had rave reviews from people working the BGP-LS - but not enough people comments. Please consider comment on this draft - with comments or support. This is a one week extension. Comment early and often. Sue ------=_NextPart_000_00CB_01D5F1A3.0E5B5ED0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Greetings: =

This is a 1 week extension on = draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-00.txt.

This draft = attempts to speed up the allocation for BGP-LS parameters = in

IANA’s “Border Gateway = Protocol – Link State (BGP-LS)

Parameters Registry”.

= This document updates RFC 7752 by changing the allocation policy = for

all of the = registries to "Expert Review" and by updating the = guidance

to the = Designated Experts.

John and I = really want to speed up any of the registries assignments of BGP-LS we = can.

We think the mechanism that = Adrian Farrel proposes provides a good idea.

We hope you will read this draft and consider if you = agree with us.

During the = 11/20 to 12/3/2019 WG LC, we had rave reviews from people = working