Re: [Idr] Joel Jaeggli's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-11: (with COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Wed, 15 June 2016 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B47C12D10E; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 07:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uPCd9GEuQ_Bb; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 07:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E725E12D0C0; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 07:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=566; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1466002399; x=1467211999; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=guGcBDRFJGB/mWeWOgOoz5g4KHd4ZqtfgW7ELGgYAqM=; b=kPU2F1F2ifA6GKkwNdFgZaeviZblaQH84cLEms6RJ4V4V4lMR51Kf3kv +H2RR4bTJIlbKuoT6THVYNrs0KlUSv/FbDHN0ndcz4NcUj9NNTXfVdHRd X935JjTv6u98B7p+KkdSfzYh8YxkU5iYomtqKxAyq7ASayGVybgYTJJ2K k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AAAgBQa2FX/51dJa1dgz6BUwa4V4IPg?= =?us-ascii?q?XmGFwKBMTgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEwBAQQ6PxACAQg2EDIlAgQBDQUbiBW/GwEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARyGJ4RNhCqFcQEEk0SFJQGOKIFTjU+PcwEeNoI6g?= =?us-ascii?q?TVuiQl/AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,476,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="284092571"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jun 2016 14:53:18 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u5FErIJg005463 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:53:18 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:53:17 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:53:17 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Joel Jaeggli's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-11: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHRxlK4BlmFtbG8c0mpsfV8+gQKLZ/pdViAgAEpSQA=
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:53:17 +0000
Message-ID: <D386D5B5.12E3D3%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <20160614153754.19291.870.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <57602C27.10803@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: <57602C27.10803@foobar.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.2.160219
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.250.152]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <D1CB737AE11E0D42BD0E68F2D4577B4F@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/MmAb523DtpC0BeZH8tQjLEGJ8nw>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "shares@ndzh.com" <shares@ndzh.com>, "draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Joel Jaeggli's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:53:20 -0000

On 6/14/16, 11:09 AM, "iesg on behalf of Nick Hilliard"
<iesg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of nick@foobar.org>; wrote:

Nick:

Hi!

>Given that ietf-idr-add-paths has been in the ietf process since 2002
>and it's now 2016, we figured it was probably a more practical solution
>to move ahead with this draft as-is, and if someone wants to document
>multiple ribs in future, this draft can be updated.

:-)

FYI..  draft-ietf-idr-add-paths is already in the RFC Editor's queue, so
it'll most likely be published as an RFC before this document.

Alvaro.