Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-09

Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie> Wed, 01 June 2016 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@inex.ie>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E829112D1EA; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XRimk5vtOdVO; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7530F12D5BA; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: idr@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u51F0kd3025676 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:00:46 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@inex.ie)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged) claimed to be crumpet.local
Message-ID: <574EF89D.6080206@inex.ie>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:00:45 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
References: <D29085C4.EFB5A%aretana@cisco.com> <5723E3B4.4090103@foobar.org> <D36A0E05.1277AB%aretana@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D36A0E05.1277AB%aretana@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
X-Company-Info-1: Internet Neutral Exchange Association Limited. Registered in Ireland No. 253804
X-Company-Info-2: Registered Offices: 1-2, Marino Mart, Fairview, Dublin 3
X-Company-Info-3: Internet Neutral Exchange Association Limited is limited by guarantee
X-Company-Info-4: Offices: 4027 Kingswood Road, Citywest, Dublin 24.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/MmTsE9yOiweOOlQXBD4XyuJbZxk>
Cc: "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "shares@ndzh.com" <shares@ndzh.com>, "draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-09
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 15:01:09 -0000

Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote:
>> We deliberately steered clear of dealing with operational issues in this
>> draft because its focus was on the bgp protocol. Several of the comments
>> you make below are probably more relevant to
>> draft-ietf-grow-ix-bgp-route-server-operations. We've marked them as such.
> 
> Does that mean that you will update
> draft-ietf-grow-ix-bgp-route-server-operations, or what?  Just wondering.
> It would be nice to have a reference from this document to
> draft-ietf-grow-ix-bgp-route-server-operations.

We thought about it and the bgp-route-server-operations operations draft
references the bgp-route-server draft, but not the other way around.
This was done because bgp-route-server is standards track and
bgp-route-server-operations is informational.  Also, it stops the
chicken and egg problem.

> I'm starting the IETF Last Call and will schedule the IESG review at the
> next available Telechat.

ok cool, thanks,

Nick