[Idr] [IANA #1435506] Early review: draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-rfc4271bis-00 (IETF 124)
Amanda Baber via RT <iana-issues@iana.org> Thu, 30 October 2025 23:37 UTC
Return-Path: <iana-shared@iana.org>
X-Original-To: idr@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F316F7F37D24; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.079
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=iana.org
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jtcdUIeQX3a8; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 420EB7F37D1C; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request7.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB14EE1E48; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 23:37:53 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.lax.icann.org AB14EE1E48
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iana.org; s=202509s; t=1761867473; bh=wN4fRvy48CRvdPVoAvHPjiMLIYQXhzBvVE7QxxdNsIM=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:CC:Date:From; b=TtM7bXDoj+BF98+eGgN8FLMzHxxK3UrNZqHqP8VqMWPFof3wFGr9/WoO7Eltk0zxb EJlaeTyKcU1YuZbfnEaN0zkplbIRvKdQc0tj3tYCWfNUmTKLrkXDfb0rEqGwtAKmEV a6B83Qlmb04H8uiksGiEVOyOT1D2xJLPoZ0hxpQg=
Received: by request7.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8B610C100F28; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 23:37:53 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <iana-issues@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-5.0.3-1040798-1761848103-87.1435506-37-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1435506@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-1040798-1761848103-87.1435506-37-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-5.0.3-1064555-1761867473-956.1435506-37-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1435506
X-Managed-BY: RT 5.0.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 23:37:53 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: NSFWHKWTUWTU323MF66YLZRAN2LMA3PQ
X-Message-ID-Hash: NSFWHKWTUWTU323MF66YLZRAN2LMA3PQ
X-MailFrom: iana-shared@iana.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-rfc4271bis.all@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: iana-issues@iana.org
Subject: [Idr] [IANA #1435506] Early review: draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-rfc4271bis-00 (IETF 124)
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/N0tKzuPXU_GSM5dhREIWN06ESgo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>
Dear Authors (cc: idr WG), Before the IETF meeting, we check working group agendas for documents with IANA-related issues. We have notes about this document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-rfc4271bis-00 1) References to RFC 4020 should be replaced with references to RFC 7120. (For what it’s worth, draft-baber-ianabis-rfc7120bis should proceed to IANABIS WGLC soon.) 2) RFC 7313 changed the name of the “BGP Error Codes” registry to “BGP Error (Notification) Codes.” 3) “Error Subcodes” is listed at https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-parameters as “BGP Error Subcodes.” I can’t locate the source of this change, but we generally recommend keeping the “<protocol name> <registry name>” naming pattern. 4) The IPFIX registries include multiple references to RFC 4271: https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix Most of these appear in description fields, but there's also one in a IPFIX MPLS label type (Value 46) registration made by RFC 5102. (This was originally housed in a table in the description field for IPFIX Information Element 46, but the table was turned into a subregistry.) If it's correct to replace those references, please add a sentence like "IANA will replace all references to RFC 4271 in the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities registry group at https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix with references to this document." If you have any questions, just let us know. If you'd like to talk in person, you can find us next to the RFC Editor's table from Monday through Thursday. You can also request another review at any time by contacting us at iana@iana.org. For more information about IANA Considerations section requirements, please see https://www.iana.org/help/protocol-registration Best regards, Amanda Baber IANA
- [Idr] [IANA #1435506] Early review: draft-ietf-id… Amanda Baber via RT
- [Idr] Re: [IANA #1435506] Early review: draft-iet… John Scudder