Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-06.txt - 2 Week WG LC (7/30 to 8/13/2019) - Extended 1 week - WG Consensus reached

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 12 September 2019 09:56 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34201200D5 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.348
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RhIDMYmRyOr1 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A8FD120077 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=97.112.17.31;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:56:22 -0400
Message-ID: <026f01d56950$5578d4e0$006a7ea0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0270_01D5692E.CE697ED0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdVpTawehkAD2UBjRASUdkcRd8u+jA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 190911-2, 09/11/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/N2PsbH8isxRQ5PxOdF3oumFAm0w>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-06.txt - 2 Week WG LC (7/30 to 8/13/2019) - Extended 1 week - WG Consensus reached
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:56:27 -0000

The WG consensus appears to have been reached by August 30th. 

The shepherd will review the draft and write-up the shepherd report. 

 

This draft has been placed in waiting for implementations because 

the authors have not placed an implementation report on the IDR wiki page. 

A page has been created at: 

 

https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param%20implement
ations

 

I believe there are multiple implementations but the authors need 

to provide this information. 

 

Sue (Shepherd) 

 

 

 

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 11:17 AM
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-06.txt - 2 Week WG LC (7/30
to 8/13/2019) - Extended 1 week

 

Greetings: 

 

This WG LC is extended 1 Week due to the confusion on the draft.   

The authors need to update the wiki page on implementations and summarize
any changes needed to the draft. 

 

We need additional support for this draft to have it forwarded to the IESG. 

 

Cheerily, Susan Hares 

 

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 12:06 PM
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-06.txt - 2 Week WG LC (7/30 to
8/13/2019)

 

This begins a 2 week working group last call on
draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-06.txt from 7/30 to 8/13/2019.  

 

You can access the draft at: 

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param/

 

John and Enke - I am counting on you gather information on the 2
implementations and post this on the IDR Wiki during these 2 weeks. 

 

For the WG, consider if:

 

1)      The technology is ready for publication or if there are flaws that
prevent its publication, 

2)      Is this technology useful to BGP deployments? 

3)      Are there any minor editorial errors the authors should address
before publication. 

 

 

Cheerily, Sue Hares