IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-14

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 20 October 2017 04:37 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80EE12ECEC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 21:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oVW6QwXdPkJb for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 21:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4A4D132D89 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 21:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1e5P3j-0007Zp-QO; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 04:37:23 +0000
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 21:37:23 -0700
Message-ID: <m2lgk6ige4.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ER=jRtacTLmfphHmDEFBq9mi58OTaTJPGDDDz-jK61JkOQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1F4BD63B-3273-469E-A3C6-4365B56724EA@juniper.net> <AC8407B8-F59B-4945-AB3E-CBEED52E8AC5@juniper.net> <CA+b+ER=jRtacTLmfphHmDEFBq9mi58OTaTJPGDDDz-jK61JkOQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/25.2 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/N3iojZSlJ2zATlJ4Se8M48rjyzQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-14
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 04:37:30 -0000

>> There is an unresolved question from Randy Bush as to whether the
>> document should really be Standards Track or some other status
>> (Informational and BCP were both mentioned).
> 
> I explained the rationale for keeping it as Standards Track document.
> 
> There is also recent outstanding question from Randy supposedly questioning
> the name of section 4.3. I personally do not see anything wrong with the
> current name.

you did not understand my point.  i was fine with the title of that
section.  i was pointing out that it was an operational guidance
section, not a protocol section.  and it had the only occurrences of
normative language.  hence my suggestion that this was an informative
bcp.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email