Re: [Idr] Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt

Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org> Fri, 04 November 2016 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <jayb@oz.mt.att.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D171295D8; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 09:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aRv3gw5lGZ7o; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 09:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E1051295DB; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 09:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049459.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049459.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id uA4GtDff024416; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:57:29 -0400
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by m0049459.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 26gwe9v76b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 04 Nov 2016 12:57:29 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uA4GvSWr008831; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:57:29 -0400
Received: from alpi132.aldc.att.com (alpi132.aldc.att.com [130.8.217.2]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uA4GvJUr008709 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:57:22 -0400
Received: from alpi153.aldc.att.com (alpi153.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by alpi132.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 4 Nov 2016 16:57:01 GMT
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uA4Gv1tb016889; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:57:01 -0400
Received: from oz.mt.att.com (oz.mt.att.com [135.16.165.23]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uA4Guowi016116; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:56:50 -0400
Received: by oz.mt.att.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BE1D2A410BC; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:56:49 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: emacs 24.3.1 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I); VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <22556.48590.936986.153377@oz.mt.att.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:56:46 -0400
From: Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20161104164923.GA30743@pfrc.org>
References: <112dc01d235fd$57f9c370$07ed4a50$@ndzh.com> <C2DABF02-D3CB-4646-B869-FBCE5F05FDA1@apnic.net> <117ea01d23611$a28513e0$e78f3ba0$@ndzh.com> <CED07D95-A426-469C-85B4-DB2FBE52D14A@apnic.net> <4080cfba032744f590fcbbb710f0d618@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com> <08C97932-4E8B-4EBC-B780-3A2F54A1EEF2@apnic.net> <C85C0950-8D91-4695-A28A-FC17B9E5AFDC@pfrc.org> <043a01d236b9$f07058f0$d1510ad0$@ndzh.com> <20161104164923.GA30743@pfrc.org>
X-GPG-Fingerprint: DDDB 542E D988 94D0 82D3 D198 7DED 6648 2308 D3C0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-11-04_04:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1034 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609300000 definitions=main-1611040317
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/NBMxWNTigC4nzKc3Wqh6zi-yrQ0>
Cc: 'IETF IDR WG' <idr@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, rtg-dir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org>
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 16:57:31 -0000

Jeffrey Haas writes:
 > Sue,
 > 
 > On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 12:38:56PM -0400, Susan Hares wrote:
 > > Should atomic-aggregate be deemed "historical" at this point?  This can
 > > happen in parallel to this work. 
 > 
 > I'd argue, yes.
 > 
 > You might recall some of the reasoning as fallout to my introduction to IETF
 > and the resultant churn in the 1771bis work as we tried to get the feature
 > to make sense. :-)
 > 
 > While I'm happy to write such a document at some point, it's something
 > that's very low priority for the WG.  In the meantime, I'll just keep
 > pushing back on things that refer to it.
 > 
 > -- Jeff
 > 

I agree with making atomic-aggregate 'historical'.  In the meantime,
the -large- work should not attempt to maintain parallels with
atomic-aggregate specifications for rfc1997 communities.

Thanks.
						Jay B.