Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-17.txt (2/23 to 3/9/2018)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <> Fri, 09 March 2018 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5C7126CE8; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 05:48:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.529
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.529 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NRUPXTKWGF9O; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 05:48:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21F1F126C3D; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 05:48:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=10868; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1520603294; x=1521812894; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=VeGnIlksz9Kqhh0cz/JA2X+5E/EeYBzSNB7E1ckR+nM=; b=XmsblxWXB3kpUAFexM8mluXYEb46cSF2O+sgq+ZTjIzlP6irK1OE+ijH lNOIoITolJ0ug/8vpe0dN+bOU5awNXVJ/tYDdbs1FCqeQTNbgWkbyJnlZ pTlYO10ieU5CYDUfwRBuoBJXtfyITsiiPXwrAQpQZyfPegQV/wripKlaC U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DeAAAfkKJa/4wNJK1eGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYJaSS1mbygKg0aKHo13gVsnexuPCYUhghUKI4UCAhqCdyE0GAE?= =?us-ascii?q?CAQEBAQEBAmsnhSMBAQEEI1YQAgEIDgMDAQIrAgICMB0IAgQBDQWENWQPA6xrg?= =?us-ascii?q?iaEcYN1ghUFhTaCLoM8KQyCQjaDLgKCEYJpMIIyBIkBkVQJAoZHiiCOYYl5hyc?= =?us-ascii?q?CERMBgSsBHjiBUnAVOioBghgJgigcgQQBAnR3iXWBFwEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.47,445,1515456000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="81078876"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Mar 2018 13:48:13 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w29DmCCW029058 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 9 Mar 2018 13:48:13 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 08:48:12 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 08:48:11 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <>
To: Susan Hares <>, "'idr wg'" <>, Alvaro Retana <>
CC: "" <>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-17.txt (2/23 to 3/9/2018)
Thread-Index: AQHTt61Db3MKqnP10UaGgszoJkk75A==
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 13:48:11 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <000d01d3acfb$61be5a30$253b0e90$>
In-Reply-To: <000d01d3acfb$61be5a30$253b0e90$>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6EEE5DED26814B70B90131A68CE69A91ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-17.txt (2/23 to 3/9/2018)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:48:16 -0000

Hi Sue, Alvaro, IDR WG,

The WG last group on the changes to the BGP Prefix-SID draft has completed with unanimous tacit approval from IDR WG. Can we go ahead and advance it? I believe we were going to send it directly the IESG w/o a second IETF last call.

From: Idr <> on behalf of Susan Hares <>
Date: Friday, February 23, 2018 at 6:09 PM
To: IDR List <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-17.txt (2/23 to 3/9/2018)

This begins a 2 week IDR WG last call on changes to the BGP Prefix SID draft.

The changes are removal of the IPv6 SID TLV/SRv6 data plane and error/conflict handling modifications to section 4. The reasons for removing the IPv6 SID TLV were explained in The error/conflict handling changes were made based on fruitful  review comments and discussions very late in the process.

Just to refresh your memory, this draft has return from the IESG to the WG.  It is the intent of the WG chairs if IDR WG reaches consensus on this version to immediately send it back the IESG for publication.

Susan Hares