From pyxislx@gmail.com Mon Feb 26 18:20:22 2024 Return-Path: X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51D0C14CE24 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:20:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.104 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rn-SfgOLfwrE for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:20:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3BEEC14F6BB for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:20:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a3ed9cae56fso612519466b.1 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:20:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709000417; x=1709605217; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=72/a0gLFZL3bko7mrlx8dgPIfc5fKk7ZnT8TvVr61v4=; b=Jv1hKSECn6C7i5w6rAYHqa6KkexmpyF7bWNdfhUzo+OhlF8N1OD9zESLrO2T0l8dnK 5e3yxTACfRSPN9y00fVpAMNdGGjrgQZuzuhvwR+eXht/UdVEm2cPcgdYc1B6PePHkb7N b6J/JgD1mEpZRVY9G3D74yf0HTj9QKt5ArUY2hB2DVApWfJelHYt9EnIQj0fveTnE71q SyiOL23QYLIiYNisKUi/CGZGFdsRTgyiT+23hvaLYKve3LKaE6oeTcHdCTrGraw7hF1O R1igxseWjiHxK9DmsNclYJJcZX7zsBJesNiuXWRf65v/Ti1YPch0B1fiFN4q5ITFs5uV imEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709000417; x=1709605217; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=72/a0gLFZL3bko7mrlx8dgPIfc5fKk7ZnT8TvVr61v4=; b=nQM+wZIR5Lj+bRhJckwF2XHkZIGPhREXU9Y0E+pd3rg6FzG85nnU+EEItSy4m3E46V tP/QulUAL++SApBp8IMUsWqXCGQDVSPRfPpMW9qn5KdP9+ukxxlbVu4FvLgDlKSnCHwi h5xBkgaszbmfsedAbA+Zon3stflpdnMW8L5KBvZJvoq24JK/I3RrgIYOM8lNVNQywgU5 jJYbz5J1GZSg9mOCJm+8C0gM1urB1R5Z1+mJEMb4IvlfFpAaHV/Md9ZbLyMMDVqEybqR 4zvLcxJc0MpoB8qGDKZiFEbSj4bwYCVz0IodDcsQ0l6tlBn01J/ne7s/xqPQGbZj127T 2piQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxIDgJ3F920dzcYO3IRFoeY/LYPIW3tXx5z9QgEveVaYWMM1gg5 7qYkz7vJzTM7XnIK4hR4iGMNqrc8r7ZyGICDTW9zzyS+KBA7xEHJHNyxLDyBD011bgh30tjK91S XOyfwcbKWJ1U7Uqgup6QxHBpVPylqMA9kvvY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH26BsnKvK2O7qJEDwsZIDf+Q0Psw65xbEUHIFE6mCXc6f4owEUZ91FtMZbbZl2sMRyyURsCvpXiv9bH9m86yU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5044:b0:a43:5c1c:70f4 with SMTP id e4-20020a170906504400b00a435c1c70f4mr2902323ejk.38.1709000417225; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:20:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Nat Kao Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:19:41 +0800 Message-ID: To: Susan Hares Cc: "idr@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ca2d05061253aa66" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Idr] Second WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06 (2/16/2024 to 3/1/2024) X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 02:20:23 -0000 --000000000000ca2d05061253aa66 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Susan. I support this document moving forward. Thanks, Nat On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 4:10=E2=80=AFAM Susan Hares wrote= : > Robert: > > > > Just in case it was unclear from the title, the draft under consideration > is > > > > draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06.txt. > > > > My apologies to the IDR WG for the late-night error. > > > > I=E2=80=99m glad your are checking what you are reading. > > > > Sue Hares > > > > > > *From:* Robert Raszuk > *Sent:* Saturday, February 17, 2024 10:46 AM > *To:* Susan Hares > *Cc:* idr@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [Idr] Second WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06 > (2/16/2024 to 3/1/2024) > > > > > > Hi Sue, > > > > > draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-ct-06 is an experimental draft. > > > > Sorry to ask but what is draft-ietf-idr-bgp-*car-ct*-06 ??? > > ^^^^^^ > > - - - > > > > Dear WG, > > > > Assuming that the above draft is just the dream of the future and that we > are last calling CAR draft here, namely draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06 I do > support WG LC on it. > > > > Nice and clean solution for those interested in color aware routing. > > > > Moreover, it is very extendable towards future needs in this space. > > > > And what may be quite important to note here - does not require any > updates to RFC4456 - instead proposed to leverage RFC7311 when preferred > path selection is needed. > > > > Kind regards, > > Robert > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 3:56=E2=80=AFAM Susan Hares wro= te: > > This begins a 2-week second WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car/ > > > > draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-ct-06 is an experimental draft. > > > > The implementation report is at: > > https://wiki.ietf.org/group/idr/implementations/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car > > > > The authors of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06 should reply to this message wit= h > an email > > If they know of any IPR related to this draft beyond the 4 IPR disclosure= s > > (ID 6098, ID 5563, ID 5562, and ID 4844). > > > > Since this is the second WG LC, please comment on any > > technical issues or editorial issues relating to the draft. > > > > We will close this second WG LC promptly on 3/1/2024 so the editors > > can provide a final draft prior to the IETF Draft deadline on March 4, > 2024. > > > > Cheerily, Susan Hares > > > > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > Idr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr > > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > Idr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr > --000000000000ca2d05061253aa66 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi, Susan.
I support this document moving forward.
T= hanks,
Nat

On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 4:10=E2=80=AFAM Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

Robert:

=C2=A0<= /span>

Just in case it was u= nclear from the title, the draft under consideration is

=C2=A0<= /span>

draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ca= r-06.txt.

=C2=A0<= /span>

My apologies to the I= DR WG for the late-night error.=C2=A0=C2=A0

=C2=A0<= /span>

I=E2=80=99m glad your= are checking what you are reading.

=C2=A0<= /span>

Sue Hares

=C2=A0<= /span>

=C2=A0<= /span>

=C2=A0

=C2=A0

Hi Sue,=C2=A0

=C2=A0

> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-ct-06 is an experimental= draft.

=C2=A0

Sorry to ask but what is=C2=A0draft-ietf-idr-bgp-= car-ct-06 ???

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 ^^^^^^

- - -=C2=A0

=C2=A0

Dear WG,

=C2=A0

Assuming that the above draft is just the dream of t= he future and that we are last calling CAR draft here, namely draft-ietf-id= r-bgp-car-06 I do support WG LC on it.=C2=A0

=C2=A0

Nice and clean solution for those interested in colo= r aware=C2=A0routing.=C2=A0

=C2=A0

Moreover, it is very extendable towards future needs= in this space.=C2=A0

=C2=A0

And what may be quite important to note here - does = not require any updates to RFC4456 - instead proposed to leverage=C2=A0RFC7= 311 when preferred path selection is needed.=C2=A0

=C2=A0

Kind regards,

Robert

=C2=A0

=C2=A0

This begins a 2-week second WG LC for draft-ietf-idr= -bgp-car-06.=C2=A0

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-i= etf-idr-bgp-car/

=C2=A0

draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-ct-06 is an experimental draf= t.

=C2=A0

The implementation report is at:

https://wiki.ietf.org/grou= p/idr/implementations/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car

=C2=A0

The authors of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-06 should repl= y to this message with an email

If they know of any IPR related to this draft beyond= the 4 IPR disclosures

(ID 6098, ID 5563, ID 5562, and ID 4844).

=C2=A0

Since this is the second WG LC, please comment on an= y

technical issues or editorial issues relating to the= draft.

=C2=A0

We will close this second WG LC promptly on 3/1/2024= so the editors

can provide a final draft prior to the IETF Draft de= adline on March 4, 2024.

=C2=A0

Cheerily, Susan Hares

=C2=A0

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
htt= ps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
--000000000000ca2d05061253aa66--