Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-17.txt (2/23 to 3/9/2018)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 13 March 2018 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8358129C56; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.529
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.529 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PqysFNoEil0x; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1E271200F1; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13756; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1520967084; x=1522176684; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=P2H0n5uaGWJ80KipeQQKV0j2zlUPKJTkOvWK62JOwCI=; b=jyB3vzM1aZe9o7YKeposm3ldZjGma1FBamxZebPc5O9w3F7/6srxQLdr MAPf7MhsqnQRAbZ+AxiDXXxMMfo2YR0c24EMMEye8FuUOlC91TxkCeWzA nDdU8L1I96n0KMu5yUlhqSvythLGVvJs61hh3Q78VT4XpMVgvvUW7YKGi 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DiAACEHKha/5tdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJaSS1lcCgKg0aKHY10ggR7G4ckh2yFIYIVCiOFAgIagwY?= =?us-ascii?q?hNBgBAgEBAQEBAQJrJ4UjAQEBBCNWEAIBCA4DAwECKwICAh8RHQgCBAENBYQ?= =?us-ascii?q?0TAMVDwOsCIImhG+CNg2BMIIFBYU1gi6DPCmCTzaCakQCghGCaDCCMgSJAZE?= =?us-ascii?q?kMQkChkKGaYM3Do5TiXo5hnACERMBgSsBHjiBUnAVOioBghgJgikcgQMBAnN?= =?us-ascii?q?3jiOBGAEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,466,1515456000"; d="scan'208,217";a="367074408"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Mar 2018 18:51:23 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w2DIpN2t004937 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:51:23 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:51:22 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:51:22 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "'idr wg'" <idr@ietf.org>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-17.txt (2/23 to 3/9/2018)
Thread-Index: AQHTt61Db3MKqnP10UaGgszoJkk75KPOiTQA
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:51:22 +0000
Message-ID: <E54FD962-0A0C-47DD-8C95-E3419D8C4D3E@cisco.com>
References: <000d01d3acfb$61be5a30$253b0e90$@ndzh.com> <6EEE5DED-2681-4B70-B901-31A68CE69A91@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <6EEE5DED-2681-4B70-B901-31A68CE69A91@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E54FD9620A0C47DD8C95E3419D8C4D3Eciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/NaqgsdGX2OQ-VutJhp1V4Y_y3ak>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-17.txt (2/23 to 3/9/2018)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:51:27 -0000

Hi Sue,
Any updates on document progression?
Thanks,
Acee

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
Date: Friday, March 9, 2018 at 8:48 AM
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>om>, IDR List <idr@ietf.org>rg>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-17.txt (2/23 to 3/9/2018)

Hi Sue, Alvaro, IDR WG,

The WG last group on the changes to the BGP Prefix-SID draft has completed with unanimous tacit approval from IDR WG. Can we go ahead and advance it? I believe we were going to send it directly the IESG w/o a second IETF last call.
Thanks,
Acee

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Date: Friday, February 23, 2018 at 6:09 PM
To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
Cc: "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-17.txt (2/23 to 3/9/2018)


This begins a 2 week IDR WG last call on changes to the BGP Prefix SID draft.

The changes are removal of the IPv6 SID TLV/SRv6 data plane and error/conflict handling modifications to section 4. The reasons for removing the IPv6 SID TLV were explained in https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/3YE8hDCj0ky0NPFoLrTHV2AAEJ8. The error/conflict handling changes were made based on fruitful  review comments and discussions very late in the process.

Just to refresh your memory, this draft has return from the IESG to the WG.  It is the intent of the WG chairs if IDR WG reaches consensus on this version to immediately send it back the IESG for publication.

Susan Hares