Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Wed, 12 December 2012 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D3C1F0CC2 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:39:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LsEi+-Ymh4Qp for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:39:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.acquirer.com (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5424E1F0CBE for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:39:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelope-To: idr@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.dyn.netability.ie (pancake.netability.ie [87.198.142.197]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.acquirer.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBCIc5IJ049457 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:38:05 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
Message-ID: <50C8CF69.4070202@foobar.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:39:37 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
References: <CA+b+ERnuWZ+r2O-eFhe3hU00uoU4UKnRcbhLNVXU7p5+DjoWbQ@mail.gmail.com> <C6C16AE3B7961044B04A1BCEC6E2F93603D12A0C@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <20121210225858.GC24937@puck.nether.net> <m2d2yh32cw.wl%randy@psg.com> <CA+b+ERnSVvewSpftXs3FhW12-S+sgnB1SwD4L+xqFW+hhbQayw@mail.gmail.com> <7120600D-71BD-4E61-8F06-25B7C2BAE6A8@riw.us> <20121211185917.GA21813@puck.nether.net> <CA+b+ERnzo2BLWjE1J_dMfYuExbG9WYJroPE4ZAWg++KK2_jy1g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERm=Agr7b6JXcXOwiP4wBjnEFmnVNt5fAJrn18R0hGtSzg@mail.gmail.com> <50C78C29.3070406@foobar.org> <50C8B8D9.4090903@umn.edu> <50C8C491.4040705@foobar.org> <CAH1iCiqfZRLv2pBEg3gKxT=ZXf7AXCPJ_+QibOpgeFfOuqFK7g@mail.gmail.com> <50C8CE86.10103@umn.edu>
In-Reply-To: <50C8CE86.10103@umn.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF IDR Working Group <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:39:50 -0000

On 12/12/2012 18:35, David Farmer wrote:
> Nick, why is this any different than creating a regexp that matches the
> current private ASN range?

well, throw the regexp on the table and let's take a look.

Nick