Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop - Shepherd's review
"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Mon, 11 April 2016 13:35 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A262012EE66; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 06:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.739
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZkqZ7_nXlBpD; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 06:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (unknown [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9238312DE70; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 06:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=74.43.47.77;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Alvaro Retana (aretana)'" <aretana@cisco.com>, "'idr@ietf. org'" <idr@ietf.org>
References: <001f01d18692$54baf1e0$fe30d5a0$@ndzh.com> <003201d18692$9835b9a0$c8a12ce0$@ndzh.com> <D3311991.11E101%aretana@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D3311991.11E101%aretana@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:35:27 -0400
Message-ID: <024101d193f7$025d5010$0717f030$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0242_01D193D5.7B5043F0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJwHADPowyCG80nMJCeGXCz75cO6QIKivx4AU4ggI+eLPBQwA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Ng0WWEVinvEcQ6VKpsTYVfX9gJc>
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop - Shepherd's review
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 13:35:41 -0000
Alvaro: I noted that the ID-NITS was confused in my shepherd report. I believe the next step is to get an AD's evaluation from Alia Atlas (responsible AD). Sue From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana (aretana) Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 9:18 AM To: Susan Hares; 'idr@ietf. org' Cc: draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop - Shepherd's review Sue: Hi! I just posted an update to address your comments. The last nit from id-nits was wrong, as there are no IP addresses in the document. The tool got confused with "Section 9.1.2.2". :-) Thanks! Alvaro. On 3/25/16, 8:33 AM, "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> wrote: Missed one more nit. Added below. From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 8:32 AM To: 'idr@ietf. org' Cc: draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop@ietf.org Subject: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop - Shepherd's review Daniel, Alvaro, Enke, John: This is a shepherd's review for draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop. Apparently, I missed sending the shepherd's report during the first call. I apologize for the delay, but I was waiting for an update for the add-path-guidelines which failed WG LC. At this point, that draft will go back in the queue as WG draft, and we will not hold up these valuable drafts. Sue Hares ================= Status: ready to go to IESG Major/Minor comments: None Editorial comments: Nits Abstract: Old /In this document we present/ New/ This document presents/ [why: Not standard language. ] Section 5.1 and section 5.2 would be clearer to the average reader if you would: Replace in section 5.1 Old /2 or 3 in the ADD-PATH / New/ 2 (send multiple paths) or 3 (send/receive multiple paths) in the ADD-PATH/ Old /1 or 3 for the same/ New /1 (receive multiple paths) or 3 (send/receive multiple paths for the same/ Replace in section 5.2 Old /2 or 3 in the ADD-PATH / New/ 2 (send multiple paths) or 3 (send/receive multiple paths) in the ADD-PATH/ Old /1 or 3 for the same/ New /1 (receive multiple paths) or 3 (send/receive multiple paths for the same/ NITS claim: There are 1 instance of lines with non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 addresses in the document. If these are example addresses, they should be changed. Please fix.
- [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop - She… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop -… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop -… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop -… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop -… Susan Hares