IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-10 - IPR call prior to WG Last call

Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at> Sat, 29 February 2020 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <c@tix.at>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59FB3A0DAF for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 08:15:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jNGSYTGM7Nfe for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 08:15:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hated.at (mail.hated.at [IPv6:2001:858:2:8::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01B163A0DB2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 08:15:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 80-110-104-164.cgn.dynamic.surfer.at ([80.110.104.164] helo=[192.168.66.207]) by mail.hated.at with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <c@tix.at>) id 1j84mF-0002U6-1f; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 17:15:43 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at>
In-Reply-To: <014e01d5ee13$07aac8c0$17005a40$@ndzh.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 17:15:40 +0100
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <81C2F530-790F-4819-93CB-91C93190F91C@tix.at>
References: <014e01d5ee13$07aac8c0$17005a40$@ndzh.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Nw0HSCWUR2_yrgqZQgkM4Z7AZ5Q>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-10 - IPR call prior to WG Last call
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 16:15:50 -0000

I am not aware of any IPR related to content of draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-v6. 

Cheers Christoph

-- 
Christoph Loibl
c@tix.at | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at



> On 28.02.2020, at 09:42, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> 
> Greetings: 
>  
> This begins an IPR poll prior to a WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-v6-10.txt.   All Authors should respond to the IPR call. 
>  
> Cheerily, Susan Hares 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email