IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] IDR WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server (2/2/2015 - 2/16/2015)

heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> Thu, 12 February 2015 07:55 UTC

Return-Path: <heas@shrubbery.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1611A1B35 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:55:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.612
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.612 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uWmLe-s7Hwko for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:55:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEAF1A0399 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:55:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id 077E146B10; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:55:06 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:55:05 +0000
From: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
To: David Freedman <david.freedman@uk.clara.net>
Message-ID: <20150212075505.GC53388@shrubbery.net>
References: <D101AA78.AA0D8%david.freedman@uk.clara.net> <m2a90jst34.wl%randy@psg.com> <D102047C.AA1A1%david.freedman@uk.clara.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D102047C.AA1A1%david.freedman@uk.clara.net>
X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc
X-note: live free, or die!
X-homer: i just want to have a beer while i am caring.
X-Claimation: an engineer needs a manager like a fish needs a bicycle
X-reality: only YOU can put an end to the embarrassment that is Tom Cruise
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/O4c_Zc0fyAa5uzDk-7-VWQWW9rs>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IDR WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server (2/2/2015 - 2/16/2015)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:55:08 -0000

Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 06:23:17AM +0000, David Freedman:
> Is't this the point of the RS, to facilitate in the face of the unknown?
> with the above approach, assuming I filter against the RS, if I wanted to,
> would I not still reach the same outcome?

great idea, but why use a RS at all?  are folks still on AGS or just
incapable of managing peering relationships?

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status