IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> Wed, 05 December 2012 03:53 UTC

Return-Path: <danny@tcb.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD2521F8BFE for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 19:53:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X-nOzqMi--1T for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 19:53:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.friendswithtools.org (unknown [64.78.239.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7B821F869C for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 19:53:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dspam (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.friendswithtools.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDE022466 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 03:53:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.17.67.35] (unknown [76.8.75.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.friendswithtools.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 869F12464 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 20:53:50 -0700 (MST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
In-Reply-To: <m2d2ysx1d0.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 22:53:49 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FF4F53AF-A851-4B65-9D36-150C6EBB474F@tcb.net>
References: <B6B72499-E9D0-4281-84EB-6CA53694866E@juniper.net> <D704E7E3-3A95-4696-9757-9E17605E670C@tony.li> <378E396E-3F4B-4ACC-83D1-C4931524FECD@puck.nether.net> <CA+b+ERneavhy1gzKRSnCfN+YjYcU0+3WgBg6f68gq=tpx8yV5g@mail.gmail.com> <1AC79BDA-C088-47B4-888D-4B0428FB7C4F@puck.nether.net> <B549F708-0D5E-4B22-AC91-B6CE61B258FE@tony.li> <CAL9jLaZdX_jem0JdSGHzuhc3GDZXMDR0kvMKq5xr3D-EWYbNVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=rL6WAMuu5cJUQk94ObUrhKKgmiNuxRhMGJbavCg6S3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaa27PZwa+fj_okSHTjjnxQeR8q67Nb5V0aYKOBbqcHtjQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERnBAOU5sbtjnPcfzmw2ieu7UPEXWbGCpsY=5hcfSUToFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLab4WZa-QA2pwhD7cuCk8iNca3xSUeJkQDxJyy4dS37WSg@mail.gmail.com> <9DCD1872-F11D-4B08-9B0B-834C05D7D0FF@tony.li> <651A9A70-3BCF-40D7-A9A4-2B276E347AB2@apnic.net> <3F381069-9389-4F83-8AB4-AD819C18EDF1@tony.li> <m2ip8kx6qf.wl%randy@psg.com> <B58F0280-F481-4A36-A586-89EDB2732685@tony.li> <m2d2ysx1d0.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Tue Dec 4 20:53:50 2012
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9898
X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 9709 chance of being spam
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
X-DSPAM-Signature: 50bec54e199631853666182
X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, 2012+at, 0.01000, Subject*Re+Idr, 0.01000, On+#+#+#+at, 0.01000, On+#+#+2012, 0.01000, psg+#+#+Re, 0.40000, by+#+#+community, 0.40000, hack+#+#+be, 0.40000, present+#+#+#+you, 0.40000, wrote+#+all, 0.40000, e+#+#+#+deployed, 0.40000, there+actual, 0.40000, we+#+#+#+is, 0.40000, as+#+reservation, 0.40000, said+#+#+not, 0.40000, to+#+the, 0.40000, or+#+#+present, 0.40000, an+AS, 0.40000, many+#+#+applying, 0.40000, message+#+#+Bush, 0.40000, doing+#+it's, 0.40000, danny+#+inline, 0.40000, is+#+#+#+i, 0.40000, is+#+#+#+i, 0.40000, i+#+merely, 0.40000, large+#+of, 0.40000, represented+#+the, 0.40000, li+tony, 0.40000
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 03:53:51 -0000

On Dec 2, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> 
> with all due respect, and even a little extra, as i said, i did not mean
> to pick on you.  i am merely reminding you and others of the iconic case
> (in the us culture) of speaking for or about non-present others.


Kinda like you Randy, pretending to be the ordained operator of operators (e.g., [1])

I agree with Shane, I support this as well.

-danny


[1] inline below...

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
> Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
> Date: November 30, 2012 7:13:09 PM EST
> To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
> Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
> 
>> There is ample demand for doing this
> 
> in the current world, there is demand for all sorts of things.
> 
> but is there actual need?  i.e. the current widely deployed practice of
> re-using an AS for many customers and applying the 'ignore as loop' hack
> seems to be working well.  what we do not have is that hack formalized.
> i think wes and shane are working on that, but i could be wrong.
> 
>> There is ample demand for doing this, it's simply not represented by
>> the SP community.
> 
> you will note a large number of SPs speaking against this proposal
> 
> randy
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status