IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> Sat, 01 December 2012 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <gih@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357EE21F8673 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:40:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.057
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.057 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.452, BAYES_00=-2.599, RELAY_IS_203=0.994, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id asH8JeK+jaLU for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:40:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp.apnic.net (asmtp.apnic.net [IPv6:2001:dc0:2001:11::199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813FD21F85B1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:40:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp148.potaroo.net (eth143.act.adsl.internode.on.net [203.16.208.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by asmtp.apnic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3C8B6745; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 06:39:58 +1000 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <9DCD1872-F11D-4B08-9B0B-834C05D7D0FF@tony.li>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:39:56 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <651A9A70-3BCF-40D7-A9A4-2B276E347AB2@apnic.net>
References: <B6B72499-E9D0-4281-84EB-6CA53694866E@juniper.net> <D704E7E3-3A95-4696-9757-9E17605E670C@tony.li> <378E396E-3F4B-4ACC-83D1-C4931524FECD@puck.nether.net> <CA+b+ERneavhy1gzKRSnCfN+YjYcU0+3WgBg6f68gq=tpx8yV5g@mail.gmail.com> <1AC79BDA-C088-47B4-888D-4B0428FB7C4F@puck.nether.net> <B549F708-0D5E-4B22-AC91-B6CE61B258FE@tony.li> <CAL9jLaZdX_jem0JdSGHzuhc3GDZXMDR0kvMKq5xr3D-EWYbNVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=rL6WAMuu5cJUQk94ObUrhKKgmiNuxRhMGJbavCg6S3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaa27PZwa+fj_okSHTjjnxQeR8q67Nb5V0aYKOBbqcHtjQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERnBAOU5sbtjnPcfzmw2ieu7UPEXWbGCpsY=5hcfSUToFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLab4WZa-QA2pwhD7cuCk8iNca3xSUeJkQDxJyy4dS37WSg@mail.gmail.com> <9DCD1872-F11D-4B08-9B0B-834C05D7D0FF@tony.li>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 20:40:01 -0000

On 01/12/2012, at 2:50 AM, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> wrote:

> 
> On Nov 30, 2012, at 7:36 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
>>> Adding new #define range to check when some filtering policy is
>>> enabled seems to me like not even in the white noise level as compared
>>> with things which BGP is carrying today and perhaps will carry
>>> tomorrow.
>> 
>> by all means, once the floodgates are open, why not drive the valdez
>> through the shoals.
> 
> 
> Come now.  This is not a reasonable comparison in so many ways.  The floodgates are not open and this hardly a large issue.
> 
> The exception is already in the code for one range.  The issue here is simply adding another range.
> 
> There is ample demand for doing this,


Oh please. Such unquantified assertions are about as much help as:

"There is more than ample demand for not doing this"

> The remaining question is whether you want it standardized or not.

no

Geoff

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status