Re: [Idr] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-11: (with DISCUSS)

Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 25 August 2022 01:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF63C1526EB; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4gUr544U9JJN; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92d.google.com (mail-ua1-x92d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBA2FC152564; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92d.google.com with SMTP id c1so2411350uat.13; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=DWaELDs9ZqKZYQRMRh47HLDIN32FioWgUzHEtqO5Gcs=; b=dRu8uSsQ1YKoeDdK3udJ6sYUufhbTR1UOm3YCtEeRF2HDkk3zeg2gfLxeSpnnSJaIU QcXlkw/pASRYfB//wBsB2rPp1hUhmm+PjsbuW3nDRN1JdcXn29cin5ZZ4JqcnVTrONZe YKy4s24msFOLC952/k4zxFqhHKHLCw+qU6CJMiOpvzqhWb0pHalQytOobkhRKI1XxOM6 VCBkSWvhUsIG2p4WcuBLEcHi7k2hjUu9os9GsGD2SoxYIpBD7ixbxkuZqAEyxvDF4WoH pLa+J/118z3Ae5vzgKLUG6A9qkalA7IFEKMu/4dv9SQ9wSTmRDJBikmz+YdTgBg9o33+ MpTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=DWaELDs9ZqKZYQRMRh47HLDIN32FioWgUzHEtqO5Gcs=; b=s680Ifu7GWIn0pglRrFTxcyStILdbyUCqxTud8grjMX1ZS+BGjZvUBHC5qzxLH8XR3 ry8/L8fOk7Glk+BMIje+YvWpHdBQqs4LlwWm4Om451q8CMPn8AiK1VHMZv7efxO6Y9uk Y9MGSZ1XnhPpu5BBfO0iaeSU2nQy5ZlCUXGq7QYDJdvC/HGkQ5sDubQq1+ntIVBDxbi2 6pXq8bqomceJTqduXzmIFi6HzsgdjlW7Sl8wD8UQPsfkPfBDXNK30RhYyipChOxlKz+P fze92woDSNElr/1nx1ZMqVTWPG1iaBFdCTcaOhguuzXSJ/Dddp+euggjwZ20/oVLHx7x jzaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2iFI0WOQg5qAPVkZcr6xUYjS5ah6JL9hVubPeI/8n+BogGRE0H yRI0ifh3VjLkyeCt4fHK2BvJIFlWjsR083NpRZU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6obqTzDTI1z5RI24PJb/fJoYDqBI76ieaL6TigE4cPeOX8XxTXqjjC3Z1PTMEPeb/3kfkJXvgDDXEb/3p8+Jk=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:44c3:0:b0:390:cdf6:4781 with SMTP id n61-20020ab044c3000000b00390cdf64781mr645536uan.12.1661392753365; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <166135143534.40937.1185131149211674654@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMMESsxJKvTrUqH+EGa9=0Y9uAYXCbuUudW0xcQT47qKWyH9Gw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH6gdPzHTb+bpmXvwP-HtFtLm0k9qAVEemdGVdW4AtKvmeyYUw@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB41870AAEB8FF8387371061099F739@HE1PR07MB4187.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR07MB41870AAEB8FF8387371061099F739@HE1PR07MB4187.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 07:29:01 +0530
Message-ID: <CAH6gdPy4_ERXnKSur-BAd2sdwvokXynN8A_9Qxuey1f66VXKNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com>
Cc: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "shares@ndzh.com" <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo@ietf.org>, "jie.dong@huawei.com" <jie.dong@huawei.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e59d6305e70724b7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/ONqJc6lGJmVHUiOFMEOK_WbreZQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-11: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 01:59:15 -0000

Hi Zahed,

We've posted an update to reflect this change:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-12

Thanks,
Ketan


On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 11:53 PM Zaheduzzaman Sarker <
zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com> wrote:

> I see, just only putting TBD there created the confusion. May be it is
> better to put something more descriptory that echoes what is written in the
> emails.
>
>
>
> I will anyway clear my discuss.
>
>
>
> //Zahed
>
>
>
> *From:* Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* den 24 augusti 2022 17:15
> *To:* Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>; Zaheduzzaman Sarker <
> zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com>; shares@ndzh.com; idr-chairs@ietf.org;
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo@ietf.org; jie.dong@huawei.com;
> idr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-11: (with DISCUSS)
>
>
>
> To add to what Alvaro said ...
>
>
>
> We put the suggested value in the IANA considerations for the DE and IANA
> review as part of our allocation request made a few weeks ago.
>
>
>
> The body of the draft says TBD since the allocation has not yet actually
> been made (so as not to give the impression of squatting on code points).
>
>
>
> Both this TBD and the IANA section will be suitably updated by us
> (authors) once allocation is done.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ketan
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 8:15 PM Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> On August 24, 2022 at 10:30:37 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker wrote:
>
>
> Zahed:
>
> Hi!
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > DISCUSS:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thanks for working on the this specification.
> >
> > I would like to discuss if Flexible Algorithm Unsupported sub-TLV type
> should
> > be TBD when it is suggested to 1046 in section 5?
>
> Yes, that needs to be updated.  The registry requires Expert Review,
> which was completed a couple of days ago, so this inconsistency was
> left over from then.
>
> Note that the DEs have approved the allocation (as suggested) and the
> value will be updated in the IANA registry during publication.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Alvaro.
>
>