Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set-01.txt

Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com> Wed, 30 October 2019 03:46 UTC

Return-Path: <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF29F120273 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FvWSpnpWgqSf for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x229.google.com (mail-oi1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60C21120052 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x229.google.com with SMTP id v186so793052oie.5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=JqBMQWmgB3KOT4qEV5YvicQMyQN4bgBIDoCdq6NLs90=; b=eI3gMig89eYg7ON//80ASdfk0j9LzhFrn0g3SBBSUWY/DFHo7N4Cq6AMgxQ8v/KRnY Z6n3Ob06eFLNfeYIcJrt8oGMe3HOAETCUH7w7thRfueKLPbTiD25/enmpwdrimt+AbVj QsH82S+rp8oVOFQKVp4YB8Zt4jzUOFj8ErUJQjbUFUpY5JM0ggQZHIuxVDXTHkYhnTh9 Q38KBXr7BX0Y9I7/6gIA6CYnR/fu/5fLXvx2MFlJQuNK8TTItjW9F++zpW0wtlWrcf5E LvRSiGPgr0VOFtl27YgCILqDyyE9g5P8VYuq+FzRhF3uIiobCohjOEtF5U82G/LlJZlU WZHg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=JqBMQWmgB3KOT4qEV5YvicQMyQN4bgBIDoCdq6NLs90=; b=VLGJrUYOPT4s5pmmnurQLEROWHKklT9TrhDVxENs7tYpvSY5ery04q6jyKQ3YV6Xwm r7jhz5OwJs1y2VCAOVnWt9+jTHkfXvdleYa1g41VyKMO4m74YRXIEjbzcxMO25uMw1Qu 4A3n4uAFa7iCjLl8QQynm8xcQkcDjUkVC3iPQhbP/ZXRuHMKsBT10Va+eWM4sBg3ioK7 TmeH/JpGDEZajDOkd+NtM8i6P3nnbZRlYmlBmvwZr/R+kGC8gnh/hEv9IEe1vcm89bFk Z5vfhyh9a6QyLrMsVHMSL/Ps8h+iN5l6lIchrmJSR1nK0jnrBGqHsEgpWk9fgJGFaS6v VWBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUSRanux014Bf9+mWWAkxEe7DGqvf9U5YKojkqYVPF+m+NYLkL8 +T6S9Jbc1FCgy02dfaQxvgahDiQXeAw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx6YEDDCHifu9XkcNMjjjL2RAX6kBqVa/klVpcA1Tx9c0otZktKvP1exKyIWr++nPdpmYfH3Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:8ef:: with SMTP id d15mr6438557oic.111.1572407160289; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Windows10AnyBody.local ([107.16.110.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q18sm361473otk.57.2019.10.29.20.45.59 for <idr@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
To: idr@ietf.org
References: <BN6PR09MB13317B7AD6F4229F5E00FDD284610@BN6PR09MB1331.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
From: Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <78f57bbd-d48f-56e1-34bc-1e5bc1532ed5@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 22:45:56 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR09MB13317B7AD6F4229F5E00FDD284610@BN6PR09MB1331.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------F68C7943795A3D9C1429841E"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/OO9tqOvyj7mC18MsOxCvRQdF8JA>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 03:46:04 -0000

Hello,

  As a comment, we did a small research and these are our findings (hope
the table shows ok):

*
*

*

 

	

IPv4

	

IPv6

  RIPE ASs doing AS_SET

	

52

	

9

  RIPE Prefixes behind AS_SET 

	

111

	

9

  ARIN ASs*doing AS_SET*

	

50

	

5

  ARIN *Prefixes behind AS_SET*

	

127

	

10

  APNIC ASs *doing AS_SET*

	

11

	

4

  APNIC *Prefixes behind AS_SET*

	

46

	

8

  AFRINIC ASs*doing AS_SET*

	

1

	

0

  AFRINIC *Prefixes behind AS_SET*

	

7

	

0

  LACNIC ASs*doing AS_SET*

	

14

	

2

  LACNIC *Prefixes behind AS_SET*

	

96

	

7

*
**


Thanks,


Alejandro,



On 10/29/19 8:50 AM, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) wrote:
> We have incorporated all WG comments/suggestions ...
> from the WG adoption call discussions:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/?gbt=1&index=PB8YtGMBvVLeAu6dot072VaDJNc 
> and also from a related thread (feedback requested):
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/?gbt=1&index=rqY4ipWnrz2TdYWkKIeZCby9HlY 
>
> The authors feel that the draft is now ready for WGLC.
> Do the Chairs and WG think that it is ready?  
> Chairs: Please advise if you think it needs to be presented (in Singapore). 
>
> Thank you.
> Sriram
>    
> --------------------------------------------------
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing WG of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Deprecation of AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP
>         Authors         : Warren Kumari
>                           Kotikalapudi Sriram
>                           Lilia Hannachi
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set-01.txt
> 	Pages           : 7
> 	Date            : 2019-10-29
>
> Abstract:
>    BCP 172 (i.e., RFC 6472) recommends not using AS_SET and
>    AS_CONFED_SET in the Border Gateway Protocol.  This document advances
>    this recommendation to a standards requirement in BGP; it proscribes
>    the use of the AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET types of path segments in the
>    AS_PATH.  This is done to simplify the design and implementation of
>    BGP and to make the semantics of the originator of a route clearer.
>    This will also simplify the design, implementation, and deployment of
>    various BGP security mechanisms.  This document (if approved) updates
>    RFC 4271 and RFC 5065 by eliminating AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET types,
>    and obsoletes RFC 6472.
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set/ 
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set-01 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set-01  
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set-01  
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr