Re: [Idr] WG Adoption - draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 2 Week WG adoption call (3/30 - 4/13)

"yangb9@chinatelecom.cn" <yangb9@chinatelecom.cn> Sun, 05 April 2020 09:54 UTC

Return-Path: <yangb9@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333403A08FE for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 02:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dbruCIPzwHxd for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 02:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.227]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4673D3A0903 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 02:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.48:63617.1944314717
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-116.22.35.150?logid-D9C601AA61C2432098319BF93A9DC1F8 (unknown [172.18.0.48]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id EEA42280091; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 17:54:27 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 71097365@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.48]) by App0024 with ESMTP id D9C601AA61C2432098319BF93A9DC1F8 for shares@ndzh.com; Sun Apr 5 17:54:28 2020
X-Transaction-ID: D9C601AA61C2432098319BF93A9DC1F8
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: yangb9@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.48
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2020 17:54:26 +0800
From: "yangb9@chinatelecom.cn" <yangb9@chinatelecom.cn>
To: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>, "'IDR List'" <idr@ietf.org>
References: <01a201d6068f$c1f3aaf0$45db00d0$@ndzh.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: 022F41B7-B32B-4EFA-943F-6E6CFE20F6AD
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.15.65[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202004051754254707114@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart665160427781_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/OXVl20RuTOn4-coTsrQd_AZfvrU>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption - draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 2 Week WG adoption call (3/30 - 4/13)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 10:17:56 -0000

Hi WG,
    Suport the adoption.

BR.
BING YANG



yangb9@chinatelecom.cn
 
From: Susan Hares
Date: 2020-03-30 20:35
To: 'IDR List'
Subject: [Idr] WG Adoption - draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 2 Week WG adoption call (3/30 - 4/13)
This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt 
 
You can view this draft at: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu/
 
This draft distributes path maximum transmission unit for the 
SR policy via BGP.  
 
Any discussion regarding on whether one desires 
SR Policy should be clearly distinguished from the 
Technical discussions on the mechanisms to pass SR policy MTU. 
 
The questions for the people to discuss on this draft are: 
 
1) Is there a need for this mechanism in networks using 
        MPLS-SR or SR-V6 and SR policy? 
 
2) Are there any error handling issues besides what is being 
     Taken care of in RFC7752bis-03.txt
 
3) Do you think this draft is ready to be adopted? 
     In this category, please list any concerns you have
     regarding adoption.  This category can include 
     general concerns about BGP-LS, MPLS-SR, 
    SR-V6, and SR-Policy.   
 
Cheers, Sue Hares