Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

[Christopher Morrow <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Brian Dickson
<[e-mail]> wrote:

> Okay, I'll bite (with on-topic example usage):
>
> Hey, Chris,
>
> I love how you show those leaks propagate Internet-wide and cause major
> problems.  ;~>
>
> And how opposing new ranges will stop current leaks of 6[45]... from
> happening, too. ;~>
>
> (Note the dripping sarcasm emoticon. :-))

I think before I said something like:
"Just because all my freinds are failing out of school doesn't make it
acceptable for me to as well" (perhaps I said, just because we started
down the hill doesn't mean we need rocket engines attached...)

why make it more possible to have problems?
why not work out the transition to the new spec if it gets approved
and moves forward?
  (note jon will probably do this part)

still not a fan of the plan, fyi.
-chris