IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] draft-ymbk-sidrops-rov-no-rr

Job Snijders <job@fastly.com> Mon, 15 November 2021 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <job@fastly.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFE13A08EC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:16:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ZxHCRCXHMtj for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:16:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 790253A08EB for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:16:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id m20so31383278edc.5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:16:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastly.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=K2cBs/hrtlgxUHRy3j1C0OgS5ztP6gOw/j84mjIrJkw=; b=N1hptMX+27B8JdDvBb4iVSnUj6URm2KDY5QPmkSbQu0zfiI3qMDQQ9QBR94OFSNG7q qg9avDUOFwsI3PmNGmIq6IwGNjE4tY2H4CKKQzWkVMJ/jSrVuF3Hf2pAQj3gNh+Dus9Y vS5PUrKSGfdla9U23Pua7avt2DaYNrLbf4ENw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=K2cBs/hrtlgxUHRy3j1C0OgS5ztP6gOw/j84mjIrJkw=; b=Y8LY/3JfAha/t5/SnQpItJt6ygsfTH1kNockH2Sr+QZ+FzK8GW84KUGsfu3u7rV54a awvWylCoJMrnkoH91Hyt6nco7QpWAB5J8UahBJJEcl8/v6jOrdPOt1rJWR3tyn5HyhZl YprfUop0gLk/lD32s2OwdEB0nTTnp8so+A/1P+xxYI6xnNIHKtzdMGJuvTRASB045IoY K59dw5Vf0pMhRS4mwBSqsRcN/U36X7CbtqKUBwvYzJssbSHXGhUhII2Y96xIbLN1ZK9c V8zw6VYN3grEvvEApo/t+RnJpXF6d9mOFL8M60v4RR0Ntflnj5ht0MphWZoeX8BrFfZm qV4g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+GcfzEx+dnaTNTpvdcgoOVILT2wPLH3rf21lEIKuTUqiHQKhv w6z3ukNNzsSFsK/929FVrn1xsQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJywLL1Omb1r98LMzk/ky5TurkuEmtGmuZU45CPkt6DenSfqAb49BLfU+B2oVDXCofaRbJQixg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:e86:: with SMTP id ho6mr2158745ejc.209.1637007389264; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:16:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from snel ([2a10:3781:276:1:16f6:d8ff:fe47:2eb7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h18sm6963464ejt.29.2021.11.15.12.16.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:16:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:16:27 +0100
From: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, idr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <YZLAG03yK4F4ZqiB@snel>
References: <m28rxptrw8.wl-randy@psg.com> <CAOj+MMHUZ26KTQje5ZO0wVubHMfvvb3QwZZm_x+TmTpTChdUdw@mail.gmail.com> <YZKpVnY/EORywfIQ@Space.Net> <CAOj+MMF+2rg69pLzR=xuK=yRKwKr1ochSzfOgYmV2-e5amZOgw@mail.gmail.com> <YZKrRx8G5SroAZ0v@Space.Net> <m2sfvxs0zd.wl-randy@psg.com> <m2r1bhs0pw.wl-randy@psg.com> <20211115190737.GB25878@pfrc.org> <YZKzwWiFFLnkvGf5@snel> <20211115195850.GD25878@pfrc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211115195850.GD25878@pfrc.org>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/OZNoHswpWoJecJ-vB-vnALa1xuI>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ymbk-sidrops-rov-no-rr
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 20:16:37 -0000

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 02:58:50PM -0500, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Randy's other commentary seems to be emphasizing the main part of the
> pain is effectively self-inflicted: If you quickly and consistently
> distribute route validation updates in a consuming network,
> implementations that are using route refresh to deal with those
> updates by doing what they're told - issuing refreshes.

I concur it partially self-inflicted, but keep in mind that any EBGP
peers receiving those ROUTE REFRESH messages as a result of this
phenomenon didn't ask for refreshes. Operators are learning about this
infliction 'the hard way'.

Kind regards,

Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email