Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-10.txt (6/4 to 6/18)(.

Andrei Robachevsky <andrei.robachevsky@gmail.com> Wed, 17 June 2020 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <andrei.robachevsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ADD33A077D for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 05:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5yf7vdcpnG3U for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 05:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6A563A0771 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 05:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id gl26so2136658ejb.11 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 05:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:autocrypt:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=tIUBoeloG5ZlJ9KW1fGmT2pFTDPFLLtb2ZwXeVfEOus=; b=uh6Y8c90lpHlVPV307JKiCbz1M2M8NZqx9dpiJkBD6hquQD0PAw04IzLcVHL5oAPy7 QZX6wyR/oNvvMjmZYQ57NwUiewHWHAfqcBOrblcurbnSiChSN7zSGoduGz8/3Kq68xYU sO3546PsvZfwmEg+Z7idhhTgsNspOrBXG1FRWB2anHwntFNDQwsiCFrvkJYSFo5PECDA 3eEtZiklcVsjCuZmHB/jKh05q4R5fpt0WEjIQn5AdsBM3wY6mJjJPDnPWa8/ZBA9/gre MTVRkJ+4EWYXyqi2wkkMO1KBZT3uMQz9XBv3AzVQicvSudR+IqI/m9OmiRK+syuK5b01 j6Xw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:autocrypt:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=tIUBoeloG5ZlJ9KW1fGmT2pFTDPFLLtb2ZwXeVfEOus=; b=Zu7YjnVCKJcHKtEsYJ4yIjXqT6kp/jPrNmklPSqxSi2i0YnvZQNZAxI2POEufkdg6L 15CnP48pSI7F3imp/ir2je4l+OeGIwKm68y03ivBqfsbBVNkYwUWNlrit6TFmCAjIWGd OWivOZFS6fB8PY2vZR/QPv8QnxI2U09Pjgvss9ZGwSmootFhAWeEt9MchXEdpEUBjAf0 8DnldeHJhcLL1HlafyXxMJRhy5MPDssrlDj+rn6dQ96xWLGO5uDM7xppyRXoe4+FwrFE CCFSWKm55qrhnQhc4NHMH3XoPrZKX6niggao7Jsg2YRjnmOg/yBYf1ZCEgxhJ74SgDJs bu8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531QMWn3d6dw3AGRGo/XM5rM14yX07zuZC3vJ7jU7Ezov8cmauMU HVUC0PiuCQbZmE36ZzKZmVw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzAjMu38ieIRHrGm+uHpBiGZ9dp9q+Z/B+3z3BJ98PVejasWBd9AoGrnGcENU1d2fKK8oE/vA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:490f:: with SMTP id b15mr7155499ejq.180.1592397923206; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 05:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ISOC-PLHTDD.local (dhcp-077-249-133-221.chello.nl. [77.249.133.221]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a13sm13418867eju.59.2020.06.17.05.45.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 05:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "'idr@ietf. org'" <idr@ietf.org>
References: <005901d63ab5$d6003e00$8200ba00$@ndzh.com>
From: Andrei Robachevsky <andrei.robachevsky@gmail.com>
Autocrypt: addr=andrei.robachevsky@gmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQGiBD8L4TQRBACI+LX/GwEK23h5OXLU7iPeZc8FJ0ywH1vVqY/gT8VCs7YzbG4GNV6omEqa 0sDBF/eYKzLC5PfaKkHeAJ51eVIcDqYDhqYNlaxr5XPWWYjOIGvVRDmp4RKxhhDgXgKMmisW RrMCCP1njNQEWYtuB64UUNit1VXbQXn2FBpEXisqxwCg6hZK7Seg5md07iu9lYQx5rng+C0D /2TkPt4t80x3Iw8WV7TSLKdEQMRG42FMIFbaZIKbiEwvfaZYNrOckxdTr8l8LvwxNxHePsVi 1sqjBR8iwtogvLhSudqXxXsj2BiYfGSpTJoiVRPKdlEzo3i1mFPV/dNTSjovzWz5c21nW9kK fUIY43sLD5aynB9WITl9O6iawOrxA/0cOwOOVrpwHdLg+Uxb9y8C/1mx3o307hZDbn84Zare aiQNOn+ETI45ucON72OoMnuaBs3fJOoreXoaOSIxuM5gSQDY/SyDqncPhZmQX8yA52fuc3Ol 8qBjEomymafFymRUFvphEr/KD9BpyBZqM41zrT5VEu2tk/ga5T+bC79W77QxQW5kcmVpIFJv YmFjaGV2c2t5IDxhbmRyZWkucm9iYWNoZXZza3lAZ21haWwuY29tPoh5BBMRCgA5AhsjBgsJ CAcDAgYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgBYhBGtZeFNYETVQoSYbeZY8+bWZrYo/BQJe3nIPAAoJ EJY8+bWZrYo/83QAoI5T60/8n3usOh52ycjc9Xpjv3XMAKCxJVDV8nC8/Y3acMjDLPVLXUVE YbkBDQQ/C+E1EAQAvRN7YTDiGXS9OPLX5yDKBtvjQaR38t5zpi0ltuC5JITDKZdM6/9PCfJq QnMy+ngrI3VQdhxbduFrC5fBszo1vVMTwKrTD6D7BEsEgC3wNE5NzfzE/fjl0LkQMEf5Vxns jvbtYw2jfoyJFig2gdW4ojmBCge16RZwx7vK7Pn0z6MAAwYEAJ7zZZCCU2DZ/gPdfB3xPZVm 7XSMpG6GBz4mFGgJW/QeC2quqoKBeAEgf0icEM8ykEAPmpy8f6j0Fwe/qz/SgxOXfTlvH8O7 md6rx2t2D+1PM2PlYzwO37U5fqnPuzp5KMXlPPryuTWZmObgZMHHsko9BbpIcqNHqUNXzNwk +gjkiEYEGBECAAYFAj8L4TUACgkQljz5tZmtij/lFQCdGIvMimtJEiYiPIZYSvXI6hx8WOQA oMj/ni+WopJxWu947/5RyWR6AUpH
Message-ID: <c1385776-581f-9886-51c6-5aa45c8cb6d3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:44:51 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <005901d63ab5$d6003e00$8200ba00$@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oD53ziNRsfVmF9ZPhv1BFBW6MDI5imFn2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/OhN_hkA-efw-5_sTxlCw1vhaBV0>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-10.txt (6/4 to 6/18)(.
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:45:27 -0000

I read the latest version (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-11) and agree
that is it ready for publication.

The only suggestion I may make it to be even more explicit about how
roles and OTC are supposed to be set or not when announcing routes
internally (e.g. iBGP). I am referring to the issue that Pavel Lunin
brought up. I think a sentence in the Introduction explaining the scope
would help.

Andrei


Susan Hares wrote on 04/06/2020 23:19:
> This begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-10.txt
> 
> From 6/4 to 6/18/2020. 
> 
>  
> 
> There are 3 implementations:   BIRD (1.76, 2.05) , FRR, and Mikrotik.
> 
> The BIRD and FRR implementations interoperate.
> 
> I do not have details on Mikrotik. 
> 
>  
> 
> Details on the  interoperability are on the following IDR wiki page:
> 
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy
> 
>  
> 
> Only one  error handling issues exists on the ability of BIRD
> 
> to send Role Mismatch (Open Error (2), subcode 8). 
> 
> Another protocol was assigned to subcode 8. 
> 
>  
> 
> Please comment on the following questions:
> 
> 1) Is this specification ready for publication?
> 
> 2) Are there deployments where this BGP protocol extension is valuable?
> 
> 3) Do you believe the error code handling is ready for publication?
> 
>  
> 
> The shepherd for this draft is Susan Hares. 
> 
> During the WG LC, the shepherd’s report will be sent.
> 
>  
> 
> Cheers,
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>