IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] draft-walton-bgp-hostname-capability-00

<bruno.decraene@orange.com> Mon, 18 May 2015 09:27 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E241A8849 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2015 02:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ZQMhH-vqVZe for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2015 02:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias243.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 670CC1A6F38 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2015 02:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfeda06.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.199]) by omfeda11.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id C549D1B80F0; Mon, 18 May 2015 11:27:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.41]) by omfeda06.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id A5E58C8068; Mon, 18 May 2015 11:27:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e92a:c932:907e:8f06]) by OPEXCLILM31.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::2cc9:4bac:7b7d:229d%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 18 May 2015 11:27:50 +0200
From: bruno.decraene@orange.com
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>, Daniel Walton <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft-walton-bgp-hostname-capability-00
Thread-Index: AQHQkDwodYxpHFIRaEeLRaCcXrFZzZ2BdYTQ
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 09:27:50 +0000
Message-ID: <28809_1431941270_5559B096_28809_6703_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A0F585C0C@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <CANL=f0h9ZV+SPr+2vcx2dEk4O9MxBAZJEU7xgHZDC=ep2g2r-g@mail.gmail.com> <m2bnhlwaov.wl%randy@psg.com> <20150516015819.5849234.74476.67011@gmail.com> <CANL=f0gAfs9f-Jt7r3bxMfB7f3Ta+funv8nvmkiCmFsQfGHTcg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaaSYWbS0dAz1Di5dksit-d_LwW4bXe8SjWyY-YPcLayEg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaaSYWbS0dAz1Di5dksit-d_LwW4bXe8SjWyY-YPcLayEg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.5.18.71217
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/OoB0uSq8DDv-Pf0Kujq3UdftvtE>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-walton-bgp-hostname-capability-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 09:27:54 -0000


> From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
> Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 2:55 AM
> 
> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Daniel Walton
> <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> > It makes troubleshooting much easier.
> 
> so does not using private addressing?
> why solve this in the bgp space? why not solve this in any of the other
> domains much better built for this?

+1

e.g. what about SNMPv1? Seems to fit all requirements:
- simple 
- available now
- works if routing is down
- works in lab
- works for all "upper" layer protocols / same name for all
- works with link local
- authentication/encryption not required
- no configuration needed  (use IP@ for the BGP session)

Regarding MIB, either MIB-II System name (1.3.6.1.2.1.1.5), or a to be standardized "BGP name", or a vendor specific OID. 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email