Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-10.txt

["Susan Hares" <[e-mail]>]

Robert:

 

100% agree.  This is the reason for the call for implementations.  

 

Sue 

 

From: Idr [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 12:00 PM
To: Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie)
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-10.txt

 

 

Shouldn't we have an implementation report draft documenting those details before WG last call on the main draft ? 

 

r.

 

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie) <[e-mail]> wrote:

Acee, Jeff,

To be more precise for Cisco we already support it in our 3 OS's
- IOS XE and IOS classic (CPE and Access routing platform OS)
- IOS XR (hig-end routing platform OS)
- NXOS (switching platform OS)
And interoperability have been tested between Cisco OS's, with Juniper JUNOS, and few others

Best Regards Bertrand Duvivier
IP routing Product Manager



-----Original Message-----

From: Idr [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie)
Sent: vendredi 24 octobre 2014 17:49
To: Acee Lindem (acee); Jeffrey Haas; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-10.txt

Agree, has been implemented in many OS's already

Best Regards Bertrand Duvivier
IP routing Product Manager



-----Original Message-----
From: Idr [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: vendredi 24 octobre 2014 17:02
To: Jeffrey Haas; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-10.txt

I just reread it for the first time in a couple years and would agree that it is ready for WG last call.
Thanks,
Acee

On 10/24/14, 10:18 AM, "Jeffrey Haas" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>The update below addressed the major open issue that remained for the
>feature, as deployed, to match the spec: The behavior for ebgp has been
>moved out of operation and into deployment considerations.
>
>I'm not an author, but I believe this draft is finally read for a
>hopefully short Working Group Last Call.
>
>-- Jeff
>
>On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 06:57:42AM -0700, [e-mail] wrote:
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>directories.
>>  This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing Working Group
>>of the IETF.
>>
>>         Title           : Advertisement of Multiple Paths in BGP
>>         Authors         : Daniel Walton
>>                           Alvaro Retana
>>                           Enke Chen
>>                           John Scudder
>>      Filename        : draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-10.txt
>>      Pages           : 8
>>      Date            : 2014-10-24
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    In this document we propose a BGP extension that allows the
>>    advertisement of multiple paths for the same address prefix without
>>    the new paths implicitly replacing any previous ones.  The essence of
>>    the extension is that each path is identified by a path identifier in
>>    addition to the address prefix.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-add-paths/
>
>_______________________________________________
>Idr mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr