Re: [Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

"Bulgarella Fabio (Guest)" <fabio.bulgarella@guest.telecomitalia.it> Tue, 03 November 2020 11:13 UTC

Return-Path: <fabio.bulgarella@guest.telecomitalia.it>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ECE3A1665 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 03:13:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=guest.telecomitalia.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zE-3ykYXX8k7 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 03:13:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx06.telecomitalia.it (mx06.telecomitalia.it [156.54.232.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C88D3A163A for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 03:13:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=guest.telecomitalia.it; s=selector1; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; i=@guest.telecomitalia.it; t=1604401989; x=2468315589; h=MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To; bh=fz0fRzOBnLzpy31g6gI3wGx8B32p1GtotlUmji5UUJE=; b=QyEAH/UQr5xyBzLRfRqkwoQFjei8374NscmoEZExMaJRvX0TWddzT0N7T2VMYaTH zIW7y10xgVkgYqCDXF7BNPW6Z+FtEbzPYVriM3Zqpk1dSjSj8i3QtXDPwUtcxayU Oa0Gg7aZ3fI+VNuE6bKr7jHQjRUoJoYKnC+loa4Db1I7c73FmqEJ8Ryb3YgWbMw+ UU7PmNvvApTUY/E2a/xv1wM3gNDg/ju99yw6WTAVi+T6ROJSJegqIiU0Sfu/TJCp ticp+NBo1+nVV4GSsgI/kV+0ZP+l1JR6EZhGWumCq6JgqMrVwwwpLjJYiS0llNGU xyr5Yq2SUmnyUna63/zf8A==;
X-AuditID: 0a5a2d16-747ff70000007f29-6b-5fa13b4537ef
Received: from TELMBXC12BA020.telecomitalia.local ( [10.90.43.46]) by mx06.telecomitalia.it () with SMTP id 95.BF.32553.54B31AF5; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 12:13:09 +0100 (CET)
From: "Bulgarella Fabio (Guest)" <fabio.bulgarella@guest.telecomitalia.it>
To: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)
Thread-Index: Adaw2PtgBctpKEXkRb++HOEf6MFzKAAXn49QAAB3ZVAAI/BKAAACN7OE
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 11:13:08 +0000
Message-ID: <1604401988670.96262@guest.telecomitalia.it>
References: <055301d6b0dc$f84da4a0$e8e8ede0$@ndzh.com> <e37f40f5d0ea4574a2de72f5fc680f04@huawei.com>, <c171dea1f3254250894d13de9d6f40e6@TELMBXD14BA020.telecomitalia.local>
In-Reply-To: <c171dea1f3254250894d13de9d6f40e6@TELMBXD14BA020.telecomitalia.local>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: it-IT
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [5.8.125.37]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_160440198867096262guesttelecomitaliait_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXCFaWtp+tqvTDeYNdNEYtXt58xOTB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoEr48HbrWwFr+0qGl5vZ2lg3GTWxcjJISFgIrFn6grGLkYuDiGB lYwSv3cuYe1i5OBgE/CSmH1HGcQUEVCUWPkpGaRcWCBf4vfxL2wgtohAgUTbvJPsELabxIcL jYwgNouAisTLxRPBangFLCS+750PNX4to8S2h79YQGZyCgRJPDvtCVLDKCArMWH3IrBeZgFx iRfTT7BDnCYgsWTPeWYIW1Ti5eN/rBC2gcTWpftYIGw5iTX7O9gheuMkFu47wAyxV1Di5Mwn LBMYhWchGTsLSdksJGUQcT2JG1OnsEHY2hLLFr5mhrB1JWb8O8SCLL6AkX0Vo2huhYGZXklq Tmpyfm5mSWJOZqJeZskmRnCc6IrtYHyw/o3eIUYmDsZDjBIczEoivDWR8+KFeFMSK6tSi/Lj i0pzUosPMUpzsCiJ8969MT9eSCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUIJsvEwSnVwDTvqt2nFRkPFbViJ8VdNHRX ClvRULCid0uW4T03xfnfFx7/H/teZrnB9Gun3jKITFCo6fysvurwzaAVAXZHq08tqNHKLvix vfRtyrUX+x4yffh+wmzTEu4rXzR9hKSnfdz1mqVry+Zzux+fkP4fvd1rxuwt9zn8z3jdOnV8 l+DetSIpH4ord15zOPhRN/ips6JEqEquHnNcbHWR7s+SpaxsgXczZ31X6bl+KcJWcPeKucc/ BC1NDZv0PeB89+yVB10Fegzq0644rtXQ5rmQH2rQHL15/pck5W5X2SMHzxlY7jO7on4+TYj3 and8xP7TJ5nXpn4zKTDQufH3wMu5T7nse1deXuBe/HD1nkjmR6klSizFGYmGWsxFxYkA/j1j 3gIDAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/PT1XnAlXNW1HW9U_CDiPzr3jLJ4>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:13:22 -0000

Dear All,

I support the adoption of this draft that implement IOAM and Alternate Marking in the context of SR Policy.


Regards,

Fabio B.



From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 6:57 AM
To: idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/2/2020 to 11/16/2020).

The draft can be accessed at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu/

The authors should provide IPR statements by 11/5/2020 so the IDR WG can consider the IPR status in their
decision.

This draft adds the IFIT sub-TLV to the BGP Tunnel Encaps attribute for the SR policy tunnel type. This sub-TLV is only valid for SR Policy tunnel types.  Within the IFIT  sub-TLV value field, 5 sub-TLVs may be included (4 for IOAM and 1 for Enhanced Alternate Marking).

The IDR co-chairs thank the authors for their patience.  The WG adoption call for this draft has been delayed by the process of switching shepherds for BGP Tunnel Encaps draft.  Many BESS and IDR drafts currently refer to the BGP tunnel encapsulation drafts.

In your review of this draft, please differentiate between the following:

  *   Support/rejection of In-situ Flow Telemetry (IFIT) as a IP routing technology,
  *   Support/rejection of alternate marking as a IP routing technology,
  *   Support/rejection of adding new sub-TLVS for SR Policy tunnel type of BGP Tunnel Encap Attribute, and
  *   Specific issues with the descriptions of these features in the draft.

Cheers, Susan Hares