[Idr] 答复: IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

[qinfengwei <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

         I’m not aware of any IPRs related to this draft and support this
adoption as a co-editor.

 

 

 

Thanks,

Fengwei Qin

 

发件人: Idr [mailto:[e-mail]] 代表 Susan Hares
发送时间: 2020年11月2日 13:57
收件人: [e-mail]
主题: [Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt
(11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

 

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for
draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/2/2020 to 11/16/2020). 

 

The draft can be accessed at: 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu/

 

The authors should provide IPR statements by 11/5/2020 so the IDR WG can
consider the IPR status in their 

decision. 

 

This draft adds the IFIT sub-TLV to the BGP Tunnel Encaps attribute for the
SR policy tunnel type. This sub-TLV is only valid for SR Policy tunnel
types.  Within the IFIT  sub-TLV value field, 5 sub-TLVs may be included (4
for IOAM and 1 for Enhanced Alternate Marking).   

 

The IDR co-chairs thank the authors for their patience.  The WG adoption
call for this draft has been delayed by the process of switching shepherds
for BGP Tunnel Encaps draft.  Many BESS and IDR drafts currently refer to
the BGP tunnel encapsulation drafts. 

 

In your review of this draft, please differentiate between the following: 

・        Support/rejection of In-situ Flow Telemetry (IFIT) as a IP routing
technology,

・        Support/rejection of alternate marking as a IP routing technology,


・        Support/rejection of adding new sub-TLVS for SR Policy tunnel type
of BGP Tunnel Encap Attribute, and   

・        Specific issues with the descriptions of these features in the
draft. 

 

Cheers, Susan Hares