Return-Path: X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28791120105 for ; Thu, 30 May 2019 01:31:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pIZSSwkpPtj9 for ; Thu, 30 May 2019 01:31:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 885A712004F for ; Thu, 30 May 2019 01:31:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id l128so3330815qke.2 for ; Thu, 30 May 2019 01:31:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tx8Qrms7ks+Lqc/QLCwKgyrs0lq1MX+H10dQAzVdDLE=; b=CeeNt5j92Ez3VcR8zd8mL7Gq0z1C4rwVBJ6XsfLE63J56E77CSTt2E4Zitgz45wEj0 Z8VybnifX4CMNb/Fx/WLQdhkjnu1bi7c8whUiOszyD64FBwaWIP29UEz3HuwOiK4rmvH nu4hpyATSKN22dS9AXg04tFIO0wVJFFOEhiajArTw93MDn+sFFxDBSzb2tpXdksiOLF+ gK8tGc9SXS5J3dXa8r1DmsiXa/qm6DVPmcBN7vtgMpGa7wMXwyIf4Fcuia97wGN48FAN WkMgZJ5MGClql2X615vEIfLnX8MiHpXmYRkR9cm3OLVxq+8TnJlD5GsRUXkJ7/1rWRaB oloQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tx8Qrms7ks+Lqc/QLCwKgyrs0lq1MX+H10dQAzVdDLE=; b=l/bOLH5369YksNGABxTmkAzSaH8EodBE8+bbnWalvU1H144iXiERVTHZj3tPKL9G6f /g2DQ1Ha/2DVRP76EgVINJIWTh1z2MXIHqfNg5MzovRYwziOqaT2QvHwAWcInawPVCkg NdaYT7P6w+rFkpvI1Bx2C4pFGDIbI0FoQ9CoqbcQcqHqQQmhnF4192QscbaKAu/KUypv R1Rx+G0mg4+JQ5R01+qYIG5SiqJH+h+5RTHTEG297GBz/9XpuhVy3Mf+vwof2XfVhx5V Jj59m34WSa2+0CWfIrpjyG9EPk0ZOjRxNLwEq+zl0Reo8RYS7g4SCcZrNsiIwRtqUgXd YcKA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWDbwvvQ7Pl/6M0RcYEW0+kGvOz9D438+hIEGSQd627vkOT6BJP WYKR+3s4uEOG9b2ZX+2jnu4jremiiRS2Yvgj10Jjp6hU X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwJxrlxaEnmlZkNpoD/6SV/XSvTqIfeWmpT71jy5vRbO4Rto8iDQbZrPw0KWTa13N4Tv9JuVNBDM49lbiypG3k= X-Received: by 2002:a37:b7c6:: with SMTP id h189mr1971357qkf.347.1559205088548; Thu, 30 May 2019 01:31:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <00b101d51699$4526dd80$cf749880$@ndzh.com> In-Reply-To: <00b101d51699$4526dd80$cf749880$@ndzh.com> From: Robert Raszuk Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 10:31:22 +0200 Message-ID: To: Susan Hares Cc: "idr@ietf. org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006f71aa058a16b94e" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Idr] 5/29/2018 IDR status updates X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 08:31:32 -0000 --0000000000006f71aa058a16b94e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sue, May I ask about the status of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-18 ? It passed WGLC, it has number of implementations, it did not change since 2016 and yet we see it stuck ... can we please push it a little forward ? Last year Nov 18th you indicated to take it over and complete review yet we luckily have may 2019 now and nothing moved :) And you do not even list it in your below great summary report. Thx a lot, RR On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:39 AM Susan Hares wrote: > Status updates (changes only) from 5/2 to 5/29: > > > > The following drafts were adopted: > > =C2=B7 draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attrib-01..txt, > > =C2=B7 draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions-03.txt, > > =C2=B7 draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-01.txt, > > =C2=B7 draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-06.txt > > > > The adoption call for draft-wu-idr-bgp-segment-allocation-ext-02 indicate= d > interest in the work, but additional work was needed prior to adoption. > After the authors spin another revision of the draft (or drafts), a secon= d > WG. > > > > Drafts Past WG LC to IESG: > > =C2=B7 John Scudder has determined that > draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-15.txt has enough implementation breath to pass > to the IESG without all portions being implemented. John has requested > any comments regarding this point be sent to him by June 1st. > > =C2=B7 draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps has been revised (see -12.txt= ). > Since substantial text was edited after WG LC, a period of WG review will > be held until June 7th. At that time the document will be sent to the > IESG for publication. > > > > WG LCs: [6/1 to 6/14] > > IPR polls have been started for the following three drafts: > > =C2=B7 draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-08, > > =C2=B7 draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis-04, and > > =C2=B7 draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-05.. > > After all authors respond to the poll, these WG LC will begin. > > > > Early Allocations approved by WG: > > 1) draft-ietf-idr-nvo3-flowspec-04.txt, > > 2) draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-l2vpn-10.txt, > > 3) draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-06 > > > > Alvaro will review these early allocation requests. > > > > Sue Hares > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > Idr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr > --0000000000006f71aa058a16b94e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Sue,


It passed WGLC, it has number of implementations, it did = not change since 2016 and yet we see it stuck ... can we please push it a l= ittle forward ?=C2=A0

Last year Nov 18th you indic= ated to take it over and complete review yet we luckily have may 2019 now a= nd nothing moved :) And you do not even list it in your below great summary= report.

Thx a lot,
RR


On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:39 AM Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
Status updates (changes= only) from 5/2 to 5/29:

=C2=A0

The following drafts were adopted:

=C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0 draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attrib-01..txt,

=C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0 draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions-03.txt, <= /u>

=C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 <= /span>draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-01.txt,

=

=C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 <= /span>draft-= dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-06.txt

=C2=A0

The adoption call for draft-w= u-idr-bgp-segment-allocation-ext-02 indicated interest in the work, but add= itional work was needed prior to adoption.=C2=A0 After the authors spin ano= ther revision of the draft (or drafts), a second WG.=C2=A0

=C2= =A0

= Drafts Past WG LC to IESG:

=C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0 John Scudder has determined that draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575= bis-15.txt has enough implementation breath to pass to the IESG without all= portions being implemented. =C2=A0=C2=A0John has requested any comments re= garding this point be sent to him by June 1st.

= =C2=B7=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-enca= ps has been revised (see -12.txt).=C2=A0 Since substantial text was edited = after WG LC, a period of WG review will be held until June 7th.= =C2=A0 At that time the document will be sent to the IESG for publication. =

=C2=A0

WG LCs: =C2=A0[6/1 to 6/14]

IPR polls have been started f= or the following three drafts:

=C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0 draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-08,

= =C2=B7=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis-= 04, and

=C2=B7=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 dr= aft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-05..=C2=A0 =C2=A0

After all au= thors respond to the poll, these WG LC will begin.=C2=A0

=C2=A0<= u>

Earl= y Allocations approved by WG:

1)=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 = draft-ietf-idr-= nvo3-flowspec-04.txt,

2)=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 draft-ietf-idr-flowspec= -l2vpn-10.txt,

3)= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 draft-ietf-idr-segment-routi= ng-te-policy-06 =C2=A0

=C2=A0

Alvaro will review these early allocati= on requests.

=C2=A0

Sue Hares

=C2=A0

=C2=A0

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
--0000000000006f71aa058a16b94e--