Re: [Idr] draft-dickson-idr-second-best-backup-02

Robert Raszuk wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> > What my draft covers, is strictly a superset, not a subset, of what
> > walton-draft covered.
>
> I am afraid what your draft talks about is not only subset of what 
> draft-walton including "incorporated work" has already described, but 
> your draft proposes to send additional single path in a new attribute 
> which is actually a step back.
>

I was referring to the solution space of the drafts (path hunting vs 
oscillations), not the encoding schemes.
Mine covers path hunting, which necessarily must include work which 
addresses persistent oscillations (as that can trigger persistent path 
hunting!).

And, if you had been following discussion on my draft, you would realize 
that the "step back" will no longer be the case.

But, I suggest you wait for the next version (under a slightly modified 
name due to the removal of "backup") before commenting further.

Thanks,
Brian
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr