Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129

[Job Snijders <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 02:03:39PM +0100, Job Snijders wrote:
> > If draft leiba-cotton becomes an RFC soon

In previous discussion about -large- you said, and I quote:

    "I proposed 'registry' and 'group' because that is what
    draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis recommends (one day, perhaps in the
    coming decade, that I-D will become an RFC but in the meantime, it
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    is the best guidance we have:-)."

Despite the smiley, I took the 'decade' part as a serious remark about
the document's volatility.

> > I think that IETF/IANA developed all the understanding that is
> > needed of the meaning of 'deprecated' in 2013 and all we have to do
> > now is to use that understanding.
> 
> Thanks for your feedback, I'll respin the draft into a -02 version
> based on this discussion and submit it later today.

Since we are past IETF Draft submission cutoff date for IETF97 in Seoul,
I can't submit the draft. However this would be my proposed -02 version
based on the feedback so far received in this thread.

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/job/idr-deprecate/master/draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129-02.txt

Changelog

    o add 241, 242, 243 codepoints
    o add "use is not recommended" (copied im verbatim) from informative
        reference leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
    o Change grammatical tense 

let me know your thoughts.

Kind regards,

Job