Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Wed, 02 November 2016 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <job@ntt.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C9912956D for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.432
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.432 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xymdhucz_f7Y for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net (mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:3ff:3::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FA651295B3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <job@ntt.net>) id 1c1wHb-0001WR-8a (job@us.ntt.net); Wed, 02 Nov 2016 14:12:52 +0000
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:12:48 +0100
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
To: idr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20161102141248.GA961@Vurt.local>
References: <20161101144036.GB10519@pfrc.org> <F744170E-172A-40E6-98EF-2A7BF6BF9DE1@juniper.net> <25D24BDC-5322-4B19-A971-9FDD65C07BF1@juniper.net> <01c101d23467$9c8b0cc0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <4070F36C-3D40-4EE8-B6F0-D077DB18875A@juniper.net> <025801d234f4$78232740$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20161102103746.GT79185@Space.Net> <20161102112754.GM1581@hanna.meerval.net> <008b01d23507$8f17a3a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20161102130339.GA952@Vurt.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161102130339.GA952@Vurt.local>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Q5x0e6qWWdufXuy87Ypn7tjZmDU>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 14:13:00 -0000

On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 02:03:39PM +0100, Job Snijders wrote:
> > If draft leiba-cotton becomes an RFC soon

In previous discussion about -large- you said, and I quote:

    "I proposed 'registry' and 'group' because that is what
    draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis recommends (one day, perhaps in the
    coming decade, that I-D will become an RFC but in the meantime, it
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    is the best guidance we have:-)."

Despite the smiley, I took the 'decade' part as a serious remark about
the document's volatility.

> > I think that IETF/IANA developed all the understanding that is
> > needed of the meaning of 'deprecated' in 2013 and all we have to do
> > now is to use that understanding.
> 
> Thanks for your feedback, I'll respin the draft into a -02 version
> based on this discussion and submit it later today.

Since we are past IETF Draft submission cutoff date for IETF97 in Seoul,
I can't submit the draft. However this would be my proposed -02 version
based on the feedback so far received in this thread.

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/job/idr-deprecate/master/draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129-02.txt

Changelog

    o add 241, 242, 243 codepoints
    o add "use is not recommended" (copied im verbatim) from informative
        reference leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
    o Change grammatical tense 

let me know your thoughts.

Kind regards,

Job