Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (Attribute 30) was squatted on - Let's get a new attribute number (1 week WG call (10/18 to 10/25)
Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Wed, 26 October 2016 01:50 UTC
Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8B41299F1 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ix4-t11ufhgL for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:50:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x234.google.com (mail-qt0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81B991299F0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x234.google.com with SMTP id 23so15885520qtp.5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=6UbYMmD9qdOLcW10lTED58Nth0WEC5pTYM2SUiwhkmk=; b=IxxLSaTTLv6W1utB7Jre7RdFBR+MzmFR6XXo4I8EQueqZg7X5fZ2YNYgbiL+1/Isq5 ACBVTVLGj1eTDIDkn/t6E+vVSaG5+TV04A1HYRLAbT4NUtEg7HRcTk3gSSaE+nrlWsis GP2B7pYn8wDHb8wFZeuUb9gdYkHf02xhTDV4pjjw/lvRPYExCPAFXPmnGf85g2XdUDY1 umOWMKjZwKDsAqfpStbqFRqxteURrXrSGx+MgZagI/bpD4R4zp6/HcknuJAQhk7+39Sl 7hlscPoxKPWcbkxgKcKELLgmnf0ggSlxmoegqXrDi69gHybIgNHLJK7txtwAwq0Bcmvz YrOw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6UbYMmD9qdOLcW10lTED58Nth0WEC5pTYM2SUiwhkmk=; b=TIaHuLT3Lt2j46GVNSOeftcKQGszBN8U/BF73z8J2qUa+ZcAjQoNnXM7CikeAKk1Cj Va4hjsZ3mj9Iv7ZkmqRGTP9iqGiWmqyXZZXfjCrM4S3tIh1YwTCgATjL2UJnmOEqK40+ 8prrCvCW45DvYGekdRIXBQdRd3DfbP+JFCLqixKKy0RRwGtSldi5oqvu79Z8bsET1vD/ CSNX7AtGpzowP87goCkNiXE00feIrOyvTSFoykRbZZXRvxphfx1GWIcTl6wLZ/JPQYnS LslZbGKXlxXwKtdwwH78vSuLlCSMwwcav4Oujp1cZcwRZCMXjhn42mkLGjCmi9TiyKJ9 PHgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdHrRFxVJ/V1K7nlUuM0uCYYwy1urQlUHGUFDJzfmtYx33DjxJOwoOIHOaD6DoCgPzZOOMAijbPQvsTuw==
X-Received: by 10.237.38.68 with SMTP id z62mr22922208qtc.73.1477446645619; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.105.244 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <db7a17a288aa4a3288dc6ec8f032b687@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
References: <1d8301d22df0$cee63500$6cb29f00$@ndzh.com> <db7a17a288aa4a3288dc6ec8f032b687@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:50:45 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: OrzuC0dumRAroF0AUfGmME174fU
Message-ID: <CAL9jLaZcCwBhUEs7cvsx3HfiPSRPXrcvOguCeuV2opSns9OZMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c12299c7ca2e9053fbadafa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/QHtqtDJfgRvh8NoyjBSyP7nGZzQ>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (Attribute 30) was squatted on - Let's get a new attribute number (1 week WG call (10/18 to 10/25)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 01:50:56 -0000
So, what's the downside to having IANA pick the next available (from the current list, prior to the 2 squatting incidents) value in cases like this? I think it's: "Some routers somewhere do bad things" (or sometimes cause other remote people to do 'bad things' .. where sometimes that other person is 'me') and when that happens: "some people quickly upgrade code to avoid the 'bad things'" (presuming that the code is available, I mean... and I do hope that vendors, all of them, are telling their DE folk: "Hey, don't do this, it's super painful...srsly!") Is that about it? Why don't we just go back to assigning the next available and deal with the problem(s) as they arise? -chris On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) <jheitz@cisco.com> wrote: > I have discovered that Cisco has used BGP attribute code 31 > > for an internal experiment in certain NXOS routers, > > but unfortunately some of the code leaked into production. > > The code does not send the attribute, > > but it receives it incorrectly. We are creating patches for the > > faulty code, but cannot guarantee that all affected routers will > > be patched. Consequently, we request deprecation of attribute > > code 31 as well. > > > > I apologize on behalf of Cisco for the oversight. > > > > Thanks, > > Jakob. > > > > *From:* Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Susan Hares > *Sent:* Monday, October 24, 2016 5:19 AM > *To:* idr@ietf.org > *Subject:* [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (Attribute 30) was > squatted on - Let's get a new attribute number (1 week WG call (10/18 to > 10/25) > > > > IDR Working group: > > > > Thank you for your input on the question of whether Large communities > should be reassigned another attribute number due to Huawei squatting on > attribute 30. The WG consensus is that the IDR WG wishes to have IANA > deprecate attribute 30, and reassign large communities another attribute > number for its early allocation. > > > > Alvaro should request a new attribute number for wide communities. > > > > If wide communities implementers request an early allocation, the WG > consensus was unclear. Therefore, the code point of 129 is deprecated for > now. The full discussion on this point is at: > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/current/msg16556.html > > > > The following other attributes were seen in the wild with the comments we > saw: > > > > # BGP function Reference > > ---- ----------------------------------------------- --------------- > > 20 Connector Attribute (deprecated) [RFC6037] > > 21 AS_PATHLIMIT (deprecated) [draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit, > unknown] > > 30 (deprecated) [variant of > draft-ietf-tunnel-encaps, Huawei router] > > 129 (deprecated) > [draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities, Huawei router] > > > > Attribute AS Attribute Observed > > ----------- -------------------------------- > > 20 AS 22742 (Peter Hessler) > > 21 AS 14706, AS 11720, AS 22490 > > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/ > current/msg16583.html > > > > 30 - in trials reported by Job > > 129 - self-reported by Huawei > > > > Sue Hares > > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > Idr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr > >
- [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (Attrib… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Michael H Lambert
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Jared Mauch
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Kristian Larsson
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Dickinson, Ian
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Julian Seifert
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Peter Hessler
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… John G. Scudder
- [Idr] Early allocation for wide communities [was:… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Susan Hares
- [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild Peter Hessler
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Wesley George
- Re: [Idr] Early allocation for wide communities [… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] Early allocation for wide communities [… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild Jared Mauch
- Re: [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild 'Peter Hessler'
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Early allocation for wide communities [… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] Early allocation for wide communities [… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] Early allocation for wide communities [… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] Early allocation for wide communities [… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… marco
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… marco
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Geoff Huston
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… t.petch
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild Paul Jakma
- [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (Attrib… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Brian Dickson
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… heasley
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… heasley
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… marco
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Sander Steffann
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Sander Steffann
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… marco
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… t.petch
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… marco
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Brian Dickson
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Thomas Mangin
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Thomas Mangin
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… heasley
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Brian Dickson
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large… marco
- Re: [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild Colin Petrie
- Re: [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild Colin Petrie
- Re: [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] Unknown Attributes seen in the wild Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] BGP Attribute for Large communities (At… Zhuangshunwan