Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00 concluded, extended to consider ASN range

[Robert Raszuk <[e-mail]>]

Hi Jon,

> However if your overall point is that 10M - 100M is not unreasonable for
> this draft as is, I agree and think certain variations of use cases
> (more the backend ones) you identified above would be Private Use if a
> single organization is allocating and managing the ASNs (in my mind more
> likely the large office backend customers than a provider, or a provider
> using BGP in these scenarios transparently / not managed by the customer).

That's precisely my overall point.

The 50% was just the example of illustration so we see the full
pendulum here not just it's small section ;-)

Cheers,
R.