[Idr] Suggestion for the serice metadata draft//Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata-19.txt

"duzongpeng@foxmail.com" <duzongpeng@foxmail.com> Fri, 28 June 2024 02:57 UTC

Return-Path: <duzongpeng@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 277F7C14F5FB for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.839
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.839 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mDL82fmoxFcG for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out162-62-58-216.mail.qq.com (out162-62-58-216.mail.qq.com [162.62.58.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B7E8C14F693 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1719543453; bh=2vHY8w79dNPNenewhBDNLkqkgdfDltEm9JpJWZGW0vk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References; b=Aw2f7bYrWB2ePU0dp9pJjFJmmG/5gv/yYL24/7FcLgM+jENgy9OztwkG7kNuJ2D7a jID1L+w7FAQ95lGBKXoINP7aI1Qm9f/IEguq8ceP9iPzTJVdCnNLubDsOJG5wE+LNX hka8wNhkURD0vtrWGqrVkc5/VQD6wjK3/Bck8CU8=
Received: from cmcc-PC ([103.35.105.47]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrsza15-1.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id E5F89887; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:57:31 +0800
X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1719543451ti2jz8kl2
Message-ID: <tencent_84E4E52A50163E58EC397C676D3C6A345108@qq.com>
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: MmpliBmRb3iC9K9yLILyysvWr8yYb1MmpWy7xHNTRhQ6OIvEKJlXDJCHWxOZCD cPy8H3p5pBmLCoB/no8ZmdB//nNUrRGV9UAKCbROQZrvCnThNpSUWgsL1X2NQgJMkX+8IWN7meRA o+fxexTzyGK7fDtvbQMn1wpCu1JlF4zDnYCjxLr5KXiGqA6FWhpZxdq5RVR4I3xP+D3nyG9ePTLj oRqKU5wW7x1+LrYwht3A5aUsa32SHVO5zo6N34yMeCMShCdir48il+8fp5GNj8wo6B5oUZgxGoka 8hA9jK5qJ98zJ2diSlrMdMen18chq0TN8Lv0BKS0dKK2OJeojwT6WlzsIB87MxsayzeMR8CxuPTO ONvRQxy2sw+gFrSAT25IJPHMUVD/BLDPFKirkoU44GnO7SlxqaUf5/D5gWDXD3i1fXM4OXWKw4hW Hn00I9CdAtcyppFFRH6zC+vEdTdG3a8AVW/0rvHmOG1CpmReQeS1K+v6IoPZq3ycBEqjtTH5V/nJ JQbUjdTLzC55gVypx4AhvtQjL7BQoucE3TjWI7ff7cQc5w6QkccARyxzSpR6T1gGF0rW0BhnheCs F4v1IuXh2ggivLBwYK6RNQtmQnJ9yLgqnQF5w1KdhgO3PkrWGdK8oWf+i/NvySdxiqV83TW0x++P Kc0TPB48Vm8dm6R6F1/cN91mOXOEEwkgOLRq2XIfLyuyKPG6LEPW4iTXPrtEpayJ3keMcTGdTLcZ +Vz0poIZXUhFJ5Pk6Ycdp1AEvTWLgh98AknH95cmV2p4nALPHwzFm0qkJTRlcUBo7CXwcFNUhFSx 0ElEezvL4c8ViDlm5C/nh/wR3HBFT2YemhFp+eylQQmNrHAGUuBJx9csrAWFaNd0Jjxeb7Q8gAX1 LDq/wrhsbsnvd/iJDMgIEQHzB18RezcTjTpGhQluDnl4mPmwv3x2q2iUUMUELl2sajagGxNTTRXq yXk38xK6ZQyf1M9z+Z5WoVQzrm+2gwst0VKWBElaE3mgMu7v0hMpA0WApDupQK
X-QQ-XMRINFO: OWPUhxQsoeAVDbp3OJHYyFg=
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:57:32 +0800
From: "duzongpeng@foxmail.com" <duzongpeng@foxmail.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>, Chengli <c.l@huawei.com>
References: <171926035861.192.16829707527682361901@dt-datatracker-5864469bc9-n5hqk>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: 0F4FC650-C493-4DC1-930E-696685FA138D
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.25.259[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-OQ-MSGID: <2024062810573137844748@foxmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart884765456352_=----"
Message-ID-Hash: NV5WD5SRJWRJ4ICMCZDTCH2NR4DSXTTI
X-Message-ID-Hash: NV5WD5SRJWRJ4ICMCZDTCH2NR4DSXTTI
X-MailFrom: duzongpeng@foxmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Idr] Suggestion for the serice metadata draft//Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata-19.txt
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Q_L9lPTeI52Fj5bL_ls1bEVIy6I>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>

Hi, Linda

    I have a suggestion for the draft. 

[1]. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata-19#section-4.7

    In the section 4.7, a untilzation sub-TLV is described. It describes the Utilization, i.e., how much of this capacity is currently being consumed.

    However, I suggest to change it to the available capacity, i.e., how much of this capacity is currently available for future usage.  In fact, it can be calculated out from the Utilization TLV by using the total capacity minus the Utilized capacity. 

    After the modification, the total capacity in section 4.6 can be used as the weight for load balancing, which is relatively static; similarly, the available capacity can also be used as the weight for load balancing, which is relatively dynamic. Which one would be used on the Ingress (decision point) is the decided by the Ingress itself. 

    The modification can reduce the minus process.


Best Regards
Zongpeng Du



duzongpeng@foxmail.com & duzongpeng@chinamobile.com 
 
From: internet-drafts
Date: 2024-06-25 04:19
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
CC: idr
Subject: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata-19.txt
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata-19.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing (IDR) WG of the IETF.
 
   Title:   BGP Extension for 5G Edge Service Metadata
   Authors: Linda Dunbar
            Kausik Majumdar
            Cheng Li
            Gyan Mishra
            Zongpeng Du
   Name:    draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata-19.txt
   Pages:   28
   Dates:   2024-06-24
 
Abstract:
 
   This draft describes a new Metadata Path Attribute and some Sub-TLVs
   for egress routers to advertise the Metadata about the attached edge
   services (ES).  The edge service Metadata can be used by the ingress
   routers in the 5G Local Data Network to make path selections not only
   based on the routing cost but also the running environment of the
   edge services.  The goal is to improve latency and performance for 5G
   edge services.
 
   The extension enables an edge service at one specific location to be
   more preferred than the others with the same IP address (ANYCAST) to
   receive data flow from a specific source, like a specific User
   Equipment (UE).
 
The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata/
 
There is also an HTMLized version available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata-19
 
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata-19
 
Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
 
 
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list -- idr@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to idr-leave@ietf.org