IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] Re: WG adoption call for draft-lin-idr-sr-epe-over-l2bundle-07 (8/2 to 8/16)

Lancheng <qinlc@mail.zgclab.edu.cn> Wed, 07 August 2024 09:13 UTC

Return-Path: <qinlc@mail.zgclab.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5AAEC14CE42 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 02:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.005
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mail.zgclab.edu.cn
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qb1T5g62EYVA for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 02:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zg8tmja5ljk3lje4ms43mwaa.icoremail.net (zg8tmja5ljk3lje4ms43mwaa.icoremail.net [209.97.181.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7287DC14CEED for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 02:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.zgclab.edu.cn; s=dkim; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID; bh=g4EgI48c/pgTu1LMkFR35hyGeZo4NyvVQckT8anGIeY=; b=QS9YqCphGCNUo Y9IOtZtNhwEZz4V8SIKwf1dMwL5tjTgYVtTPY6s1qYut7fUImtFJJ7I5sMoBm3Zw 4lprbo7aRWLnAQBdonPdDJPh5BZtjIV5cWZa4y1MVMzu4rbjT5v6FqlCy34SODvN ujG9U/GIsDopX/v6eqCVI9HgnrH9BI=
Received: from qinlc$mail.zgclab.edu.cn ( [58.206.203.140] ) by ajax-webmail-web5 (Coremail) ; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 17:13:03 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
X-Originating-IP: [58.206.203.140]
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 17:13:03 +0800
X-CM-HeaderCharset: UTF-8
From: Lancheng <qinlc@mail.zgclab.edu.cn>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Coremail Webmail Server Version 2023.2-cmXT5 build 20230915(bf90896b) Copyright (c) 2002-2024 www.mailtech.cn mispb-4df55a87-4b50-4a66-85a0-70f79cb6c8b5-tsinghua.edu.cn
In-Reply-To: <SY8P282MB4885F8EF2E6BE5376C4726A7FCBF2@SY8P282MB4885.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <SJ0PR08MB66220668F30E8B89E4C697C2B3B32@SJ0PR08MB6622.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <SY8P282MB4885F8EF2E6BE5376C4726A7FCBF2@SY8P282MB4885.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_114805_962905166.1723021983091"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <147eb19c.819a.1912c1cfd73.Coremail.qinlc@mail.zgclab.edu.cn>
X-Coremail-Locale: en_US
X-CM-TRANSID: zAQGZQAXCSyfOrNmz+VODw--.16838W
X-CM-SenderInfo: xtlqzuo62juzldeovvfxof0/1tbiAQICBmay-XQqNAAAsE
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Ur529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7IcSsGvfJ3iIAIbVAYjsxI4VWxJw CS07vEb4IE77IF4wCS07vE1I0E4x80FVAKz4kxMIAIbVAFxVCaYxvI4VCIwcAKzIAtYxBI daVFxhVjvjDU=
Message-ID-Hash: Y2B2ZPN453WR6YVI62A4WUTNPD7JVYRD
X-Message-ID-Hash: Y2B2ZPN453WR6YVI62A4WUTNPD7JVYRD
X-MailFrom: qinlc@mail.zgclab.edu.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Idr] Re: WG adoption call for draft-lin-idr-sr-epe-over-l2bundle-07 (8/2 to 8/16)
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/QdW-5iN-UK1XZkHnApIu0gptq9c>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>

Dear WG,




I have reviewed this document and support the adoption.




1. Does this BGP-LS addition help SR Egress Peering points in operational networks?
Yes.
2. Does this draft handle the BUM traffic in a way that Prevents looping?
Yes.
3. Are there any problems in the technology described? 
I have not seen any problems yet.




Best,

Lancheng





From: Susan Hares
Date: 2024-08-02 22:11
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-lin-idr-sr-epe-over-l2bundle-07 (8/2 to 8/16)

IDR WG:

 

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for  

draft-lin-idr-sr-epe-over-l2bundle-07.txt

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lin-idr-sr-epe-over-l2bundle/

 

 

The authors should reply to this email with an

IPR statement indicating whether they know of an intellectual property.

 

This document describes how to support Segment Routing

BGP Egress Peer Engineering over Layer 2 bundle members.

This document updates [RFC9085] to allow the L2 Bundle Member

Attributes TLV to be added to the BGP-LS Attribute

associated with the Link NLRI of BGP peering link.

 

 

In your comments regarding adoption,  please consider

 

Does this BGP-LS addition help SR Egress Peering points

in operational networks?  

Does this draft handle the BUM traffic in a way that

Prevents looping?

(Broadcast, Unknown Unicast, and Multicast (BUM))

Are there any problems in the technology described?

 

Cheerily, Sue Hares

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status