Re: [Idr] Shepherd writeup for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Thu, 08 April 2021 12:01 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5B93A1429; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 05:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fWYsZ-4kesCT; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 05:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF103A1420; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 05:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E35E01E44B; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 08:23:38 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 08:23:38 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20210408122338.GJ7355@pfrc.org>
References: <20210220180942.GA19875@pfrc.org> <MW3PR11MB45702898FE1539DB84F803D5C1939@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <MW3PR11MB45702898FE1539DB84F803D5C1939@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/R61MBKP_gEtw0UsxDtdYHVKjynI>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Shepherd writeup for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 12:01:23 -0000

Ketan,

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 06:35:26PM +0000, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> Thanks for your review and comments. Please check and let know if I've got your complete review (it was the same in the IDR archive) since we sometimes see truncation when emails are send out with comments embedded within IDNITs text.
> 
> We've posted an update for the draft with comments addressed as clarified in detail inline below.
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions-05.txt

Thanks for your update here, and your patience.  You've addressed my review
comments.

The lingering item here is consensus among the chairs on proceeding with the
RFC 7752 reference vs. the -bis.  We will hopefully have closure on that
point soon.

-- Jeff