[Idr] Any WG LC requested?

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Mon, 24 February 2020 13:56 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1D73A0BAA for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 05:56:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.225
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.225 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.276, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1o887ni9GIYi for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 05:56:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E0203A0BA7 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 05:56:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.177.57.99;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:56:52 -0500
Message-ID: <002e01d5eb1a$45068570$cf139050$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002F_01D5EAF0.5C318EE0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdXrGSJPHX14e2lcTGSVnN8coN/1ZA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200223-0, 02/23/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/R7eE9fLpV41rZBEsDHTF9gFG9oQ>
Subject: [Idr] Any WG LC requested?
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 13:56:58 -0000

Here are the potential WG LC that I have gotten: 

.
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy/>
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-07.txt ,

.         Draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid

 

Where there others I have missed?  

 

The chairs wish to have  discussions on the following topics at IETF 107:
BGP flow specification, BGP auto-configuration,  BGP over IP-SEC, and the
latest BGP model draft. 

 

If you have additional topics, please make sure you've posted a draft or
asked for the next step in WG action (adoption, review, WG LC).

 

I will post a status message in 2 days after this query.  

 

Cheerily, Susan Hares