IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Comments on slides-99-idr-03-idr-rs-bfd_ietf99-00.pdf

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Tue, 01 August 2017 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73333131838 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 13:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jQscGADP4Hcy for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 13:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28C78129B40 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 13:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: idr@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v71KZwhU038102 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Aug 2017 21:35:58 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged) claimed to be crumpet.local
Message-ID: <5980E62D.4040505@foobar.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 21:35:57 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.16 (Macintosh/20170718)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
CC: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
References: <441c2f03-e061-726a-4b14-14c452d25f2e@cisco.com> <20170731191304.GW24942@pfrc.org> <CA+b+ERkJhy_-_A66N5KKQ0KqOTu=qTRbRKTAHNzeohcvYaFzxg@mail.gmail.com> <20170801163858.GE24942@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170801163858.GE24942@pfrc.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/RHp6VZX15fpmTlYbbuci6_LjyRE>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Comments on slides-99-idr-03-idr-rs-bfd_ietf99-00.pdf
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 20:36:03 -0000

Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Yes, it does work best when the client is in a view by itself.  But as noted
> on-list, some IXPs deploy that way.

you could probably upgrade that to from "some" to "most".  Per client
loc-rib is pretty standard these days.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email