IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt

"Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com> Mon, 03 October 2016 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jheitz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A45A1293F9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sqaLn45bsRaw for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 099AE129415 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=789; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1475513595; x=1476723195; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=b7CumeRjIf2dK8z3Sn0nfeybliYxPL6J9bxdirE05LQ=; b=GOC/K0e9zW/pD2Kax3aHzJ+iydqIhe/1xiQ40kwheaPlaX5RmcjyDlAm LVJO0Ea1vxSXbubzHygZ0monP19XkKzmdwM2oDpq4hw3ceeqt9kz16bzp B5hcUtGmt5EgwPubeToqPcWHqfCRZvTlYv3Q1tUJ0PdJjepM+RwVB5ODr I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DeAwAOjPJX/4cNJK1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgz0BAQEBAR6BU6QxlCOCBoYeAoFlORMBAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4RhAQEBAwE6PwULAgEIGB4QMiUCBA4FFIgxCLp2AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHIY4gX0IglCERIMvgi8BBJl4AY9wj3KMboN9ASABM4UMcodVAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,438,1473120000"; d="scan'208";a="157924692"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Oct 2016 16:53:15 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (xch-aln-013.cisco.com [173.36.7.23]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u93GrFJI008152 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Oct 2016 16:53:15 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 11:53:14 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 11:53:14 -0500
From: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSG79TGAvzbRTYaUOLNdatGR0q+6CTny8AgALbUg+AAFuDAP//w9BUgABdGYCAAD/ogP//s3BtgABU8wD//7aMOw==
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 16:53:14 +0000
Message-ID: <D5115E3C-371A-4397-B8EB-090CE6B5A4F1@cisco.com>
References: <147531113077.4216.12599976309263776317.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161001085434.GW20697@Vurt.local> <005b01d21d58$aaf869e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20161003095936.GC20697@Vurt.local> <04cf01d21d68$52c656a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20161003115723.GD20697@Vurt.local> <57F27D3F.7090404@foobar.org> <74D0D4D0-0885-4E11-BDAB-85F9356B4AA1@cisco.com>, <20161003161608.GG3127@Vurt.local>
In-Reply-To: <20161003161608.GG3127@Vurt.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/RIJ_Nne0cL7Mwx6k6m9bAnnOE88>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 16:53:20 -0000

I write code. I watch people write code and test code. It adds to development time. 3 ranges is not necessary. It's messy.

Thanks,
Jakob.


> On Oct 3, 2016, at 9:16 AM, Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 04:12:05PM +0000, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) wrote:
>> One thing of substance that changed is the definition of 3 reserved
>> ranges.
>> 
>> 0:0:0 -          0:4294967295:4294967295
>> 65535:0:0 -      65535:4294967295:4294967295
>> 4294967295:0:0 - 4294967295:4294967295:4294967295
>> 
>> 3 is messy. 1 is enough. Which one do we want?
> 
> My personal take is to keep all three of them reserved. I don't consider
> it messy at all. More feedback from the working group is appreciated.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email