Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)

"Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com> Thu, 16 February 2017 11:30 UTC

Return-Path: <sprevidi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FB1129A8C; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:30:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5mAu1fcu5cC0; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:30:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C40912955F; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:30:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2017; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1487244640; x=1488454240; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=CzCHvWf8W90fqX/1IPeER+in+x8BdJ4EvGwa7MQ880Q=; b=hLzOHfFpyOi7nwCqqmJIFbnAWivNKw6Swb7u7O4Y8ukgAxmmtnFKnBM3 L/gP8w4R2ajm+WGA63OgbjkeAnceFOmxKzGTN5VKyUFSRz1B8XyZbu870 yubSSyzywldSfL3MhCqvctYEu0v9uTkiH109TvE1YLvP+xAuqN1ZjDTa9 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AVAQCnjKVY/49dJa1eGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1FhgQkHjVqSEJUzggwfDYUsSgKCHT8YAQIBAQEBAQEBYiiEcAE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQMBAQE4NAsFCwIBCA4KHgULJwslAQEEDgWJZAgOsi+LOwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBARgFhkyCBYJqhFSDNIIxBZVYhiMBhm+LJpEGkxYBHziBAFEVPRE?= =?us-ascii?q?BhGqBSHWJKoEMAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,168,1484006400"; d="scan'208";a="207458687"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2017 11:30:39 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-003.cisco.com (xch-rtp-003.cisco.com [64.101.220.143]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1GBUdWe029030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:30:39 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com (64.101.220.150) by XCH-RTP-003.cisco.com (64.101.220.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 06:30:38 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) by XCH-RTP-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 06:30:38 -0500
From: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Thread-Topic: [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)
Thread-Index: AdKH5ALnHgVYM3zURr+F4Gs1EKSVZgAjf1oA
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:30:38 +0000
Message-ID: <49CD63A7-AA91-47D5-A1D8-69FDECD6AE15@cisco.com>
References: <00f901d287e4$16ecb2f0$44c618d0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <00f901d287e4$16ecb2f0$44c618d0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.209.26]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4DD45BCFE8FA9D49827211F395761D32@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Rg3OfU3Z5SeSN36GIMccwcHyYgA>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:30:43 -0000

> On Feb 16, 2017, at 12:34 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> 
> This begins a 2 week IDR WG last call on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe from (2/15 to 3/1/2017)    There are two implementations describe on the wiki at: 
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe%20
>  
> The two implementation are from  Cisco IOS-XR release 6.0.2 and Cisco Nexus Switch N9000/N3000 platforms running NX-OS 7.0(3)I1(1) or greater.   The authors will indicate on the list and in the wiki the following information :
>  
> 1)      Were these implementations separate implementations? 


yes.


> 2)      What were the results of the interoperability tests? 


the two implementations are interoperable on the set of features they support. See https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe%20 for details.


> This work is linked to the draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe work in the SPRING WG. Based on the two drafts, the WG should might consider:  
> 1)      Is there need for this work in deployments in networks/ 


yes. This work has been triggered after several operators requirements for egress traffic engineering.


> 2)      Is this technically ready for publication? 


the authors believe so.


> 3)      Does it fit with the spring informational draft? 


yes. The use-case draft describing EPE (draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe) has been adopted as WG doc in SPRING and it started the shepherd review.

Thanks.
s.


> For the ease of reference the web references are below: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe/
>  
> Sue Hares 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring