IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Using BGP to advertise SD-WAN tunnels end point's private IPv6 addresses. (was registering tunnel types

Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Mon, 05 November 2018 10:44 UTC

Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC12012EB11; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:44:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xRI3UC1y4yJE; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:44:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 678FE130934; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:44:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 1096BAF6A66C0; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 10:44:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.40) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 10:44:11 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.103]) by SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.13]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:44:06 -0800
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Using BGP to advertise SD-WAN tunnels end point's private IPv6 addresses. (was registering tunnel types
Thread-Index: AdR0BGE++Z0BF4I3RCC8M7+3nc3iHQBDGb8AAAd6+dAAAh9GgAAQuA7Q
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 10:44:05 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B182BBD@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B18249E@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com> <6E397847-407E-4F69-AD31-E87D0001F603@gmail.com> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B182B93@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com> <A55564ED-B913-437C-8442-DA5962F2BEC3@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <A55564ED-B913-437C-8442-DA5962F2BEC3@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.126.174.222]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/RpbjAYq1esLu2JDvTli5XBsePE8>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Using BGP to advertise SD-WAN tunnels end point's private IPv6 addresses. (was registering tunnel types
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 10:44:15 -0000

Fred, 

How does my phone (being IPv6 address) communicate with a web server that is IPv4 public address? 

Linda

-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Baker [mailto:fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 5:42 PM
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
Cc: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>; Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>; idr@ietf.org; int-area@ietf.org; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Using BGP to advertise SD-WAN tunnels end point's private IPv6 addresses. (was registering tunnel types



> On Nov 5, 2018, at 5:40 PM, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> If a CPE-1 has private IPv6 addresses for its ports behind NAT, and CPE-2 has IPv4 address, can CPE-1 communicate with CPE-2 by the NAT's IPv4 address?

There is no such thing as an IPv6 private address. I'm not sure how to respond to the question.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, Defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
     Sun Tzu

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email