Re: [Idr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-17: (with COMMENT)

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 06 May 2020 22:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476443A0B98; Wed, 6 May 2020 15:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VKFbpPII8cWq; Wed, 6 May 2020 15:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 280023A0B97; Wed, 6 May 2020 15:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id z1so1839912pfn.3; Wed, 06 May 2020 15:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version; bh=PF74SddD2Nvzl0EGLWxTacTvW9I2xJ6blOAf48atpM8=; b=RTt4Du6HpQyFbuZtytotPVe4Tnn5JlowP3fBh9ZlNAWxfzla440SPaRl/yJGFWE4Jv 08UUGnRzCLEW0UOUqUivgOPvq9YW31n7pT3TO0V9fHCUZupSooBEckvOsbKjCA4y4xUG inYWLM5IvGxAhgvEsvyD4uQbrLDgIR5EvnFBRbbPV9nNrZmjSF618tuqB8gvE2Zle/Jk Xpr6RDZf5YrgyiVIXE+kB/64n0pTZLCrBbBKeecuXIpcY+wfIQZAv6Mk8qbcvM0Wxqir pkburwn/fa5QaQX6pDVIG29y+IxuQO/47sZsHE8B6UOV9MIWIIPTFlU1cNsMtwnNMc6I SPew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version; bh=PF74SddD2Nvzl0EGLWxTacTvW9I2xJ6blOAf48atpM8=; b=YGoDO23WF1gSfJfSQ91MoSxvL01+ono56CKgJYuJJwxPLJwZrsOM0/nYy+DxyCgMvV qNBMJJEn4B70PSlZLdqLS48ISsLtaeS2hbjZzJxu5wx1jm9nq0cOy4uQnENBNf4YUdBn QgbZCEJ5BM/tFiSrK/i5FJf3XE+N6fKb9FzQKTTIl0PjizPgZpZ53i54yueOY//waV4i o+FVdE3TOK/wymFP/hd5hI9dB9GW/8xUwpTdEYLiB7JTcH96YcPWkJeE9iEQQkqJENZK t0pqgQLVDI2JUYIn9P0i4cdg72y6nm3K4VWaLR2PcY+2xyCo64SbHWZg/PvX1YzMpm1B nW2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubxGRyM93DfzSDud0i4Wyw8oK134xAzbQZYBJetYDJ1F1RbU7Wf L4nsR21JOzVt6VvBpP3TYuk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJucuSAR6epJi19JwVETTsn+D8QrEjiqlgUPGUPkQ3eTUgqjQGWbOjgSkJ5d9kW0mZFeOa2Rg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:9d8c:: with SMTP id i134mr8550002pgd.152.1588802424674; Wed, 06 May 2020 15:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (c-73-63-232-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.63.232.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ml24sm5547926pjb.48.2020.05.06.15.00.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 May 2020 15:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 15:00:14 -0700
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <3c5cb80e-d0ff-4b6c-9bc2-6b0825ac0985@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <B56DDB34-F801-4CA5-8002-4A4855F1919B@cisco.com>
References: <158877618917.28357.7766329814068414619@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMMESsw2ACjCXS0gLfogwOd2zM2oBpNhpMrUKQGvQoKHH6dK=Q@mail.gmail.com> <B56DDB34-F801-4CA5-8002-4A4855F1919B@cisco.com>
X-Readdle-Message-ID: 3c5cb80e-d0ff-4b6c-9bc2-6b0825ac0985@Spark
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5eb33376_f819e7f_2480"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/RyxcoAx4tHt75KzBkRclNSlp-8Q>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-17: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 22:00:27 -0000

Eric,

Many thanks for your review and comment.
Great to see - Alvaro has addressed all your questions!

Please let me know if there’s anything else.

Cheers,
Jeff
On May 6, 2020, 2:57 PM -0700, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>, wrote:
> Alvaro
>
> Thank you for the added piece of information. This clarifies a lot my questions/comments.
>
> Very much appreciated,
>
> Regards
>
> -éric
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, 6 May 2020 at 23:32
> To: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>, Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-17: (with COMMENT)
>
> On May 6, 2020 at 10:43:51 AM, Éric Vyncke wrote:
>
>
> Eric:
>
> Hi!
>
> ...
> > While it is unclear to me whether this document applies only to SR-MPLS, but,
> > if it applies also to SRv6...
>
>
> This document is about the ability to carry the MSD in BGP-LS. The
> applicability to SR-MPLS and/or SRv6 depends on the type of MSD
> carried -- and with it any requirements about how to advertise, etc.
>
> Right now there are only 2 MSD-Types defined, and both are related to
> SR-MPLS [1].
>
> If more types are defined, then those documents will have to describe
> how the contents should behave and what they mean.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Alvaro.
>
>
> [1] https://www.iana.org/assignments/igp-parameters/igp-parameters.xhtml#igp-msd-types
>