Re: [Idr] I-DAction:draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-04.txt

"Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com> Mon, 17 September 2012 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <rajiva@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B077621E804A for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RfED2jk+QAfM for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E5421E8048 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=870; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1347912720; x=1349122320; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=jiXHY7QZsW1DtZIfDswVui1F7GJ3xRDN1UHYfdTSoCY=; b=INBfVgtKlgy9PDjML3J5eOaBEAFrO4Afh3JAeFeUUSiIqmKW918W7cEg lWFFQsAM4phGB1emPYzJ6R7YnvBy8fVam8+U2sBB1GQjxaHBWEes7ZTT3 UH/Amk+vZln84pjkStPP36VqNJt66/EqnrgxXXrsCAP4n1HKLV3esO5os s=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,437,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="122479730"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2012 20:12:00 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8HKBx2Y027122 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:11:59 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.6.230]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:11:59 -0500
From: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] I-DAction:draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-04.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNkF3bS4R0+tJICk+IzRajqVtbIpePEWWA
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:11:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CC7CFBB7.3468E%rajiva@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120911204142.GI8139@pfrc>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.82.237.12]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19188.004
x-tm-as-result: No--31.007800-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <28EF96D2CB8B0E46A70A9B53B12A3E7B@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "Robert Raszuk \(raszuk\)" <raszuk@cisco.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-DAction:draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-04.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:12:00 -0000

Sure, will fix it (though I have not kept track of what was done after the
WGLC). 
Thanks, Jeff.

Cheers,
Rajiv

PS: Wow..you are checking emails from an yr ago? :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Date: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 4:41 PM
To: Rajiv Asati <rajiva@cisco.com>
Cc: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>et>, "Robert Raszuk (raszuk)"
<raszuk@cisco.com>om>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 
I-DAction:draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-04.txt

>On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 02:53:50PM -0500, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote:
>> Done. -05 version just got posted.
>
>Nit:
>: 4. Conclusions
>: 
>: 
>:    Both amendments discussed in section 2 provide further clarity and
>:    granularity to help the BGP speaker to either continue to advertise
>
>You mean section 3 here.
>
>-- Jeff