Re: [Idr] draft-chen-bgp-redist - A Juniper Perspective

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Sat, 21 August 2021 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDA03A1677; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 09:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wNpMcdkcBMGz; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 09:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329253A1676; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 09:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4F3FC1E27C; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 12:28:40 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 12:28:40 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Enke Chen <enchen@paloaltonetworks.com>, idr@ietf.org, draft-chen-bgp-redist@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20210821162840.GF19054@pfrc.org>
References: <CANJ8pZ-mz8KuWBkgYjuKSRwTW2ycq2VkQKYRqnnFquPQEQ=GNg@mail.gmail.com> <5D874729-4FC1-4AD6-BD6C-BDC473B6B342@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5D874729-4FC1-4AD6-BD6C-BDC473B6B342@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/S9g96yKlo83WEdrsNZdZVq4XOEs>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-chen-bgp-redist - A Juniper Perspective
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 16:28:44 -0000

Jeff,

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 03:59:38PM -0700, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
> Perhaps RFC5004/router-id (in densely meshed eBGP topologies) behavior  deserves a good discussion as well.

A topic I've discussed Sue in the past is we're in need of some documents
discussing some BGP protocol intrinsics that really aren't well documented.

The one you mention is an example of "your domain really needs to implement
consistent route selection procedures".

This is also a reminder that I have errata for RFC 5004 to file and keep
forgetting to do so.

-- Jeff