[Idr] 1 Week notice of intent for: draft-ietf-idr-rtc-no-rt-00.txt
"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Tue, 16 June 2015 00:05 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6600C1B322F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.155
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.155 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rBqoxR7uq2K6 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (hhc-web3.hickoryhill-consulting.com [64.9.205.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 174E01B322A for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=8.25.222.10;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:05:46 -0400
Message-ID: <00ff01d0a7c8$325b5ad0$97121070$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0100_01D0A7A6.AB4B4170"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AdCnxThF9INTx0GUSLG2JmQc2ZxfFQ==
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/SRcuh0UHAxJAbjU6xnAorCYHkuo>
Cc: "'John G. Scudder'" <jgs@bgp.nu>
Subject: [Idr] 1 Week notice of intent for: draft-ietf-idr-rtc-no-rt-00.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:05:53 -0000
IDR WG: The IDR Chairs find that draft-ietf-idr-rtc-no-rt-00.txt solves an important administrative for RTC for address families that do not carry RTs. However a WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-rtc-no-rt-00.txt had no responses. This is a notice that the WG chairs intend to forward this draft to the IESG as a WG consensus document. John and I suspect that people are focused on BGP protocol changes or BGP yang modules rather than worry about the administrative documents (reasonable for WG members). However, the chairs must worry about the administrative drafts as well. This 1 week WG call is to ask the IDR WG if anyone objects to forwarding this document as an IDR consensus document. Sue Hares
- [Idr] 1 Week notice of intent for: draft-ietf-idr… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] 1 Week notice of intent for: draft-ietf… Jon Mitchell