Re: [Idr] draft-chen-bgp-redist-01.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 29 June 2021 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960633A17E9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 13:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sWvA4SXqzSxK for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 13:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2FE83A17E0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 13:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id d25so32676291lji.7 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 13:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Bm7VUeTTpVshypyReotctM417Y4X5Y/XjCBrXjxXLAc=; b=GvmCCzAAFsMNiLK12krZCRTLSzKZ0CbykMkycpdfIHAaU2lSzIJ+fF0TTlGIqd8acp feLC6owsO5MXhiSt8D0iRYBCOAW344KD3cb2VCfgeRHpfXqtXDdw3VG9q0tP5shesMQF BLXwZPbfC24ZmToqqrij+Lbv2G/8nSILa9BEWU08T+G/9283E2c95UudxJGiJG5yagwj i5BjPgrUw2P90PmTRhGHkMP8ByLt1l8My9H9CIZc4scFz+JVmaffV/L7WmcDi7NrlJGz o32z34sJZfwqAhALOX6XUGJCYDqrvAn5MfzTIN1z/8N1peK3vXyPZ9Vbj1FXB0aXxlyM GReQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Bm7VUeTTpVshypyReotctM417Y4X5Y/XjCBrXjxXLAc=; b=fOytwvqfR6LBMdYka9I1rtka2O9ZFOyewJlFIAMUH9x5Y/Xltl2uFDIO/KQvebK3th /JOLLDus2vBvbeC5fMNDvb8SE3iwg8ByCzOXlhEC/HXgnRx74YzZBu4Ywj7eoC5p0Ywg V5NSsaHiUDATQpu1KxVwQFG508uDlb20xj45H5le4Tc1ppdhPXSj3oGRYHfuwPVSWo5q V95B0GQNTGxSC5ur6IM759OA7rWRitCh1Q6sKJEKvrUUoajeR5OtKzBhNxeWyASrLx2g jskvx1f3OPqOnmCGbJgTxC9+6QcmwErG7o8RlaDGJtOcgF5C3FHnmaoXZOkukg7lzsQc Vepg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Ve8bX2kWgzUuF771q6T0195LacLHW/jkm1TnShHxiaWr9Y5XO /Qog11ye7D1Rbt14wfHd7vr025twNc/kXSCuSESdHQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz6F8UBi1plcvxXc50RCYfyEWJNiD9j+bNCjvksouTMKvzrHFZlPrXZM3FnSPsykHJD0LIkRXLGmPgfTf9a/Vs=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9744:: with SMTP id f4mr5325474ljj.199.1624997154504; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 13:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANJ8pZ_2yk666tSca818-e0YdziKjK3dMqhopOtYAP3vKXTEmQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANJ8pZ_2yk666tSca818-e0YdziKjK3dMqhopOtYAP3vKXTEmQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 22:05:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MME5zZeZDnhpfivbdKj00JwBzi9rjMmzBXxE_fFqkxEVpA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Enke Chen <enchen@paloaltonetworks.com>
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, Jenny Yuan <jyuan@paloaltonetworks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000027d39605c5ed2257"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/SU9vHsJ1TVIIQETCLJERd3Oo4mo>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-chen-bgp-redist-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 20:06:04 -0000

Hi Enke,

How do you assure that admin distance is the same or delta would be the
same across implementations ?

Looking at say junos I see quite different values then when comparing with
other implementations ...

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/reference/general/routing-protocols-default-route-preference-values.html

Would it be simpler to define here verbatim what the local pref should be
for redistributed routes ? Then at least those could be used as default
local pref values unless overwritten by operator's policy during
redistribution.

Thx,
Robert


On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 7:14 PM Enke Chen <enchen@paloaltonetworks.com>
wrote:

> Hi, Folks:
>
> Apologies for the very long delay in updating the draft:
>
>        https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-bgp-redist/01/
>
> The issue still exists, and shows up from time to time. The revised
> version provides a complete solution that covers the use cases involving a
> single router as well as multiple routers in a network.
>
> Your review and comments are welcome.
>
> Thanks.   -- Enke
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>