From nobody Tue Aug 10 09:41:18 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DC33A13CC; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:41:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ilIgooyexFHz; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:41:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE9BC3A14B5; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:40:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id b7so31191399edu.3; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:40:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9t/gYRiLDZrdq2CByIPJVwE8K6+0Ai7ECw9RD2TRKGI=; b=j/nHi/SK0xw3by6eGRp+c2IdwuPgYV1w5MQ+KOtT6nX3nbd39YYIpjNNxAeyu4b61z UV/ilNb/etcS1+vCzoZv6AXz/+95pDmU42Ua6Jh757MrBczuGYQgzufA1iQtZmzJBai/ QS8FvXBbJKmQYousOL1M5gjNdG6mhL1OITLACCuca8XLxAvOwNEfcvRLEz+2MwdBtpHM mS1DRgvUJ+tdwAyxrJIyk1GmbjuqiFprTtAXhiMMS1njlwcz56l81u/UYSsAj3j8xPP+ oNgMJ6y1drdecZ4OCpxBh9UXHMPZf/mTgeAcpChOh+qa8sn5a6udQ/76O3CSWfOyCZgQ Rf/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9t/gYRiLDZrdq2CByIPJVwE8K6+0Ai7ECw9RD2TRKGI=; b=JHyTq+rAQJBIi0X2pxbwI2AhEYJloA3A11JgZ/yKxIrG0eS+q/kqTGo8pUmGyUqXo7 qq3wMdjsJzmLbFBWgyQCXuykJ9a1Xh8IvBUIeaX+riSN8Xk974eSt55rAuoCMVSsxCPQ SXl+V7NRrA13xjtFXZ1rcruYrSVeHdDC4jIRxEESEuW4Pymfk6/HCJqRQ3iUxbuTSqui +6UKIz+EEaxgk6s1lXDjbg1U2xKlZo0NTMAYRk8ecfIm50r5oL900z9ZQdXUGPW9pJRy P3Ln68bLxiZKJgTxJvzsU7iVMCOa4JM5VtdvjBvK2tST6yjyWFwvkHEZIu++Txw7QK3x 3dAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530PF7gvudCDKweCna1catc7Am+cP1XWoElxshGazn/wLYO/EPMR 4nPfygEAo1LLOgmrVQ+w3E2al5AODnuO6IBLJBQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxtN+hl2aZdvX+w/TZDxVXjh5mMEW3LCRn+KWItY9IhtjLOqyDiAg1nI37zMgDk08/1AXq1f6C9V8yqcY4JzJI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2547:: with SMTP id l7mr5874847edb.314.1628613630576; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:40:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 18:40:29 +0200 From: Alvaro Retana In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 18:40:29 +0200 Message-ID: To: Alexander Azimov Cc: Susan Hares , draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy@ietf.org, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" , "grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org" , IDR List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-15 X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 16:41:15 -0000 On August 10, 2021 at 12:23:09 PM, Alexander Azimov wrote: Alexander: Hi! > We tried our best to carefully consider all your comments, incorporated > changes accordingly in version -16, and uploaded it. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-16 > > Our (authors=E2=80=99) responses to your specific comments are inline bel= ow and > marked with [AA/KS]. Thanks for the update! =C2=A0I'll put this in my queue of things to review.= :-) > Before jumping to the long list of inline comments I'd like to highlight = that > while policy specification is better worded now, their principles remain > unchanged. Good! =C2=A0The intent was to make the specification clear, not to change i= t. Thanks! Alvaro.