Re: [Idr] some thoughts on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-09.txt

"Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> Mon, 03 August 2020 09:45 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578253A0D2C for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 02:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RGJbSlqrdgx0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 02:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de (mail.hs-esslingen.de [134.108.32.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7F193A0D2A for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 02:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0920A25A2E; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 11:45:14 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hs-esslingen.de; s=mail; t=1596447914; bh=HE9hYq5q2XlqN/kcJghPETTYGoyjsg6F/+6JHBFRH7o=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=K65/zj5RYz+EvkMm6z+IOfvnrZT4BBUQj2pYZbPaK9oxZObL+j+dpa9uk6CXl2DVJ HmpkiMBxpoP7Qf+EUfiQLSZfH/5st8HKb/A9iCJO9MY6NWyz5QONPVFtkuUEn6tF00 RUV1OXKTUXziYo1S/uBJP1aY1Uu0OhUrbcCKIZV0=
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.7.1 (20120429) (Debian) at hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hs-esslingen.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N4b7Jj8bilFX; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 11:45:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rznt8101.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (rznt8101.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de [134.108.29.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 11:45:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from RZNT8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([169.254.3.171]) by rznt8101.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([fe80::bd73:d6a9:24d7:95f1%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 11:45:12 +0200
From: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: some thoughts on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-09.txt
Thread-Index: AQHWaXjZCGPPDzKuHUWE2eLmaO/4+6kmIEzQ
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 09:45:11 +0000
Message-ID: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2DCEF17C@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
References: <005401d6659d$31ad4c40$9507e4c0$@ndzh.com> <133E5D36-A696-4314-8588-7992E52D190B@gmail.com>, <007101d66759$938f7150$baae53f0$@ndzh.com> <AM7PR07MB62485BC88F847F9EFE88CB1AA04D0@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR07MB62485BC88F847F9EFE88CB1AA04D0@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [134.108.48.164]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Se4cEGRSzHW81QEP92OM2Sul1H4>
Subject: Re: [Idr] some thoughts on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-09.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 09:45:17 -0000

Tom,

One comment on a detail...

> scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp is an import and so MUST be a Normative (think about
> it; TCPM just published an I-D that started life 10 years ago,

draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-00 (i.e., the first version of a YANG model discussed in TCPM) was published in Oct. 2018.  I am subscribed to the TCPM mailing list for at least 15 years. And I don't recall any earlier work regarding YANG in TCPM.

All,

TCPM currently confirms WG adoption of draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp on the TCPM list. Feedback from the IDR community would be very welcome.

Michael (as contributor)