Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)

"Ketan Jivan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com> Thu, 16 February 2017 11:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ketant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A4F129A1C; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:34:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iYuY4_XBzw15; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:34:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89E7D1299A9; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:34:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=12880; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1487244844; x=1488454444; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=DIQM70veXD/80/B4LkqN3fryBvZdOFCInqkBfcUlEO4=; b=ToNwb3W6epGowNYmngg3wtNrrzqPY8Pf/d7x5VjU25Rd3nVQ1Po68ZfH B/XSDajhdRdCdbe3X8tTdeSmDiLbpbX5/K1bqbA1dQW/buh3PxZVtUvlR n1QdNwXaWxmAcYiu2dToSv5ryoKWh4ZXbOPiXQiDTFQRaXl7EltN0foxB o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BjAQDZjKVY/5RdJa1eGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBgm9iYYEJB41akhCQB4UsggwshXYCgh0/GAECAQEBAQEBAWIohHA?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEELUwQAgEIDgMEAQEkBAcyFAkIAQEEAQ0FCIlkDrIyizsBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYZMhG+FCoUvBZVYhiMBhm+LHZEPkxYBHziBAFEVPYR8gUh?= =?us-ascii?q?1iSqBDAEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,168,1484006400"; d="scan'208,217";a="181210320"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2017 11:34:03 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1GBY3df027375 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:34:03 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 05:34:02 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 05:34:02 -0600
From: "Ketan Jivan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)
Thread-Index: AdKH5ALnHgVYM3zURr+F4Gs1EKSVZgAZHD7g
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:34:02 +0000
Message-ID: <79d597ffee2d4231af7d0e0439fca3d6@XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com>
References: <00f901d287e4$16ecb2f0$44c618d0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <00f901d287e4$16ecb2f0$44c618d0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.65.54.241]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_79d597ffee2d4231af7d0e0439fca3d6XCHALN008ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/SndD8OxlWS0gi3_4FvpxxM0HO8c>
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:34:06 -0000

Support this draft.

Thanks,
Ketan

From: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: 16 February 2017 05:05
To: idr@ietf.org
Cc: Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aretana@cisco.com>om>; spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)

This begins a 2 week IDR WG last call on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe from (2/15 to 3/1/2017)    There are two implementations describe on the wiki at:
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe%20

The two implementation are from  Cisco IOS-XR release 6.0.2 and Cisco Nexus Switch N9000/N3000 platforms running NX-OS 7.0(3)I1(1) or greater.   The authors will indicate on the list and in the wiki the following information :


1)     Were these implementations separate implementations?

2)     What were the results of the interoperability tests?

This work is linked to the draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe work in the SPRING WG. Based on the two drafts, the WG should might consider:

1)     Is there need for this work in deployments in networks/

2)     Is this technically ready for publication?

3)     Does it fit with the spring informational draft?

For the ease of reference the web references are below:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe/

Sue Hares