Re: [Idr] WG Last Call foir draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages (11/12 to 11/26)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 21 November 2017 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38ECD129AC7; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:23:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id feNRADqnT2HM; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:23:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x231.google.com (mail-wr0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F73129510; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:23:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 11so8483019wrb.6; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:23:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=00UtpFTreVzTQOfs4WGcls2OCji3sZeqsptrPKcm1E4=; b=QdOAmi3cqJcfUmtN+1sqqRM4DaDWcdYf3VvTl9PEdaogYAo5oTCf7JzXGCtUBF9fgJ onTkCsI1t3p4I3Qv6pOqvc8XVzUPhijZ0NT5C+jrU/6+uHzEgYGiTChaCk3iIXdnSK5V S5EEH1LSYCgSvcF3uN0dQdntREDHYo70iEpvmwtmWHyKOep+nofHL8X7XpsG/iCmq/Yx NuySomPoc9C6M6LSVf8cMcjVRw6fhMj37gmuD6f8/wYyAqzxfLTja1qCO9NYcEdc155o UP3bs1hHHQBktC+dVApPlcV/7fv9qktNOhnjFexwlqE3QhaEV+GoXrAilZWFGj5M4+06 fP0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=00UtpFTreVzTQOfs4WGcls2OCji3sZeqsptrPKcm1E4=; b=IYlqUJyJlz+3ImFinzfHTZ8nKA2v1YHDNix3OWf+IBqL6UA1ugFlTviV4vxl4G8tGV mmC6NVRNmg27+d82ihR/nQDu4+H128NJ//vHQvWBfNY1FR6gmbKM2lv69lk1zrs1JxjU UNOERbwDDK8lV5VAdVKuboXnhSQsCXpast6eWN2FBijK9gNMjDupVQZjSekI0pIFOVb/ Yp7YO6Y+w7vzf2HLcWb0p4KYvQeNyC09RAyUfwOHOqwWvHplU9B9D1NOeInjIWKK12YI anfkWBW+CcrpTWaq2Y8ZNQEaaT/Q02DYrKvN3wVMZ7mZhFmu91ImgsaMPrGGSY+0Cgyf 9wDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4IhQJlkme7sVrmq42TeVfPAJAI8fP/Lo83zdksmhq0noIjjomW rMJlg5eU+v7PrLu0icrqminnjunnKTNqZsweW/LylA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMamg9piOQr1xXAYq8E/+imncIfN5GzH5LWDftYjtR8dy/tbNWFe/yz1M4r4k1cYxru+5ifX3DMqymkt48WbssA=
X-Received: by 10.223.131.129 with SMTP id 1mr14594299wre.205.1511281394169; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:23:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.28.54.217 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:23:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CACWOCC9Yde99EbhLrveCtoUVSZWiP=sL=k69zrGBeNj5AjCGFQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <000901d35c08$3f12d950$bd388bf0$@ndzh.com> <B61C3B8F-1168-4EB1-8D8E-88C4BF28B3AA@exa.net.uk> <CA+b+ER=1sHhAqhOc2VipzZMB+Zsxk8n+8cNUshkjPw_A9k9E-A@mail.gmail.com> <39049A8C-6D47-4251-AF87-342F68DDE8AE@exa.net.uk> <CA+b+ER=ANs15BEmRKeqneVHNcTSCsGDMVDQgFV4OucwPSWcLgw@mail.gmail.com> <CACWOCC9Yde99EbhLrveCtoUVSZWiP=sL=k69zrGBeNj5AjCGFQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 17:23:13 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: s-4KuKqz9nng5otNVtCn7R6d2-Y
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERk_2XZ_Y3EqSjNAbSi1ZqKhD2oThrRR2EOJzckQ41GijA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Cc: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org>, Thomas Mangin <thomas.mangin@exa.net.uk>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, idr-ads@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0d2326a7be02055e809ec1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/SxZtaijUDiVlrAaG9jhFXYHJCos>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Last Call foir draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages (11/12 to 11/26)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:23:18 -0000

I don't know why this is not spelled out in the draft ....

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> wrote:

>
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 at 15:03, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> My take would be to make it enabled by default (potentially with a knob
>> to disable it if needed) .. otherwise we are creating even worse swiss
>> cheese even among those implementations which do support it.
>>
>
> + 1 to this.
>
> I’m working on another open source implementation that will have this
> enabled by default as well.
>
> Seems sensible if all vendors would take that approach.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Job
>