Re: [Idr] Call for IETF102 IDR agenda items

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Sat, 30 June 2018 11:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5711310A2 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 04:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QEsw-Z1wNlQ0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 04:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x233.google.com (mail-pg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E33B4130DE6 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 04:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x233.google.com with SMTP id n2-v6so5106544pgq.6 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 04:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=yj+35z761HIjAuvBRGxcK3+Bm0K7/oI8PdK6mFNfPDk=; b=VCBT67Q1LVtLU6EokG7goj/IZ6Ecvhu7hS2jcuLTzVDZyLMOxLgnNNCVDiR4z5HQEZ oLILmvpNI1HFCL6OjQ7evbTqi6SXsh4F7ChgCUZdwrBlonGckxyWhPlJpA5BJ9BIHihy ZXLPuoQKZ0wysqdt9kWpBcFPqqkx7a8e7o3gb/wMgqB2S0p16ZKdfoXRwFgsl3q9Vnxf ZOCo/Pc5CewwDkzt6Z8TIET61enr0PNy4NSD9z0jphduB9HjDpfg5tWjQ251kS39TNXW 8zjCrocLk2H1U155n35uHttS00M7i21VrUBK24tez+Cn0ubpDVcyoNdSZ+3oJNIRSH+z ETcw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yj+35z761HIjAuvBRGxcK3+Bm0K7/oI8PdK6mFNfPDk=; b=apcJM3DIigYPtJ6wb1wzLlDsKn0wuXyYMMbjxssLf0VUevhHcrgyracQDbc/t8Vo9T kg0v2ZJHtZDe7Yt0rXJ2KF4C7866FwA4mfxwGYFmdwMk+fPe3X5RRx5Qjy266/rwYthT Wp4yoy0wCuZA66GhyN+E/+dLkiM9za9S+HZMuYjoPLTcuVPuY3LAQh0TZZKrCMopgdd5 fF1Oa/PNzrf6oCQFwHZ31uKBTKvlu3ZHL8wqTPUaBnrWuNLB1CMUmZ9D24oaBh+7MhfL 7IqL+2RcQ6NLUigSxmg39jtgCSMwhI8WopxPfQ3Rm8bmWu72WMk0YlkM+m/KRn8Y7jxy 63rg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3qTG19ihCIigOQMoCTJ+XFrX+hBsp8c3VscVGRZiboxBW0fTeW g2Jmw9HaYrj7OMhlADCoM3wCIBanzA+2iOhvW19PoA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpftsKHsld2a7WF3vZAa/IJhXnCcsXTDMhkIVsaMKJGfaAifVu6z3kBcmO3cQbb4z8nJDgpw12E8HCNOSOReQRk=
X-Received: by 2002:a62:e0d5:: with SMTP id d82-v6mr1138337pfm.59.1530359391231; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 04:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6d62:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 04:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <04c61224ff2747928adccc6ab054c131@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
References: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927A6D35F0C@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <04c61224ff2747928adccc6ab054c131@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 13:49:50 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: lQ6v3m7Bjr_lUK8Js5VrjXB3QHU
Message-ID: <CA+b+ER=uMGhEBCn_Kjtn3-APruYQ6rezYr4z96XofnbCOduB=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e4a32d056fda8f90"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/TMSB1cJO9Ws_oDd6xnd7daDkeN0>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Call for IETF102 IDR agenda items
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 11:49:54 -0000

Hi Jakob,

Can you explain to WG why XXC is not a variable length ? What is so
prohibitively hard to make a community a variable length once for good?

Also what is now so magic about 24 octets being the right size which just
few months back was so hard to imagine when defining Large Communities to
be fixed 12 octets ?

Is any of the application you listed in sections 6-12 so new that no one
really knew about them when Large Communities were being defined?

Last - when XXXC draft is coming out ?

Kind regards,
Robert


Jimmy,
>
>
>
> I'd like a 15 minute slot to present draft-heitz-idr-extra-
> extended-community.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jakob
>
>
>